रसगंगाधर (पण्डितराज जगन्नाथ - रसतरङ्गिणी संस्कृत व हिन्दी व्याख्या सम्पूर्ण प्रथम आनन)

rekha down to the loop! It looks like 'मि'!
Wait, but is it just a heavy ink bleed on 'नि'?
Look at 'नि' in "नहीं" (line 30): 'न' has no stroke from the top.
Wait, why would it be "ध्वमिव्यंजक"? "ध्वनिव्यंजक" is the obvious word. If a user asks for transcription, do they want the transcription of the text as printed or corrected? Usually faithful, but standard Hindi words like "ध्वनिव्यंजक" are often printed with slight ink bleed. Wait, if it's ink bleed, it's 'ध्वनिव्यंजक'!
Wait, let's look at "हो" in line 23:
Is it "हो" or "हा"?
"नहीं हो सकते" - the matra might just be missing or broken. "नहीं हो सकते" is universally correct.
Wait, what about "कचनादेरपि" vs "रचनादेरपि" in line 21?
Let's look at line 21 again very carefully:
"तदतिरिक्त" + "कचनादेरपि" or "रचनादेरपि"?
Wait, look at "रचनादीनामपि" in line 20: 'र' is just a simple stroke.
In line 21, the letter is clearly 'क'. A typesetter mistake for 'र'!
Wait, let's keep 'रचनादेरपि' or 'कचनादेरपि'? In scholarly OCR