ताण्ड्य महाब्राह्मण / पञ्चविंश ब्राह्मण (सायण भाष्य एवं चिन्नस्वामी शास्त्री टीका सहित)

वारणेन"
Wait, does it have an avagraha?
If someone transcribes it, could it be interpreted as avagraha?
Let's see: in line 6: "स्पष्टोऽर्थः" - the avagraha is 'ऽ'.
In line 22: the glyph is 'ऽ'.
In line 28: the glyph is 'ऽ'.
In line 9: the glyph is 'ऽ'.
Wait! If it is printed with the EXACT sort as the avagraha glyph 'ऽ', shouldn't we consider how people transcribe it?
Wait, why would a typesetter put 'ऽ' before 'व'?
Look at line 9: "स्तं ऽवरणशाखया"
If the typesetter literally used the 'ऽ' type sort, or if in this edition the editor used 'ऽ' to indicate something (like an elision or doubling or pause)?
Wait, look at line 9: "शाखयाऽवारयन्त" - here 'ऽ' is undoubtedly an avagraha.
Look at line 28: "पशवो वै ऽवारवन्तीयग्ँ"
Wait, look at the glyph in line 9: "स्तं ऽवरण...".
Wait, does it look like 'ऽ' or 'व'?
Wait, look at line 29: "तत्सव्वँत्सरात्"
In line 29, what is between 'स' and 'वँ'?
It is THAT SAME GLY