रतिरहस्य: असली कोकशास्त्र (पण्डित कोक्कोक - कामकला, दाम्पत्य-जीवन एवं सम्पूर्ण रति-विज्ञान)

! "स्त्रियाँ और"!
Now look at line 20:
"हजारों [glyph] के ज्ञान" -> wait, what is after the glyph?
It is: [glyph] + [matra i] + य + ाँ = "स्त्रियाँ के"!
Wait, does it say "स्त्रियाँ के" or "स्त्रियों के"?
Look at line 20:
It is 'स्त्रियाँ' (there is a chandrabindu, though faint, or is it 'स्त्रियों' with a matra 'ो'? No, it has an 'ा' bar, not 'ो'!). But wait, is there a chandrabindu on line 20? No, wait, look above: it has no 'े' or 'ो' matra. It says "स्त्रियाँ के" or "स्त्रियों के"? Wait, actually it looks like "स्त्रियों के" or "स्त्रियाँ"? Wait, let's look at the letter:
After [glyph+i] is 'य' and 'ा'. Wait, is there an anusvara? In Hindi, people often write "स्त्रियों" or "स्त्रियों" - wait, in line 20, look at: "हजारों स्त्रियाँ के" or "स्त्रियों"?
Wait, look at line 20:
"हजारों" -> र + ों (with anusvara and matra).
Then: "स्त्रियों"? No, the letter has NO top slant! It has an 'ा' stem: "स्त्र