रसगंगाधर (पण्डितराज जगन्नाथ - रसतरङ्गिणी संस्कृत व हिन्दी व्याख्या सम्पूर्ण प्रथम आनन)

? No, it looks just like म.
Wait, why would it be मतएव? In many Sanskrit books, printers frequently confuse अ and म (or the typesetter picked म instead of अ because they look similar in the typecase: अ / म).
Wait, but could it be अ? Let's check if the left loop has an upper part. No, the top bar connects directly to the left stroke, exactly like म.
Wait, let's look at the text:
Is it अतएव? In meaning, it is 100% अतएव! ("अतएव विकृतवर्णं तवेदमाननं राकापतिः... इति पदार्थः ।")
Wait, does the prompt say "pure, clean Markdown in Unicode Devanagari"?
Should I transcribe what is printed, or correct it, or what?
Usually, transcribe faithfully to the print, but let's check whether it's अतएव or मतएव.
Wait, look at line 9: साफ-
At the end of line 9, it's साफ-.
Wait, where is ल्यम्?
Wait! Could the first letter of line 10 be ल्य? No, it's not ल्य.
So ल्यम् । was simply