मन्त्र रामायण (नीलकण्ठ चतुर्धर - पं. रामकुमार राय सविस्तार हिन्दी व्याख्या सटीक)

"? No.
Could it be "त्वो" = "त्व" + "उ"? (in sandhi, त्व + उपसमीपे = त्वोपसमीपे)?
Yes! In Sanskrit, 'त्व' can be an old/Vedic or colloquial form, or simply a sandhi of 'त्व' (or 'तु' + 'उ' = 'त्वो'?? No, तु + उ = त्वो! Wait! "तु" + "उ" = "त्वो"?! Wait: त् + उ + उ = तू. What about "तु" + "ओ"? No. What about "त्व" + "उ" = "त्वो"? अ + उ = ओ! So त्व + उपसमीपे = त्वोपसमीपे!).
Or simply: typesetter error for "त्वं उपसमीपे" or "त्वोपसमीपे"?
Wait, what if the character is "श्वोपसमीपे"? No meaning.
Wait, what if it is "छ्वोपसमीपे"? No meaning.
Wait, look at the image very closely at L27, first word:
Could it be "त्वोपसमीपे"?
Yes, it very much looks like "त्वोपसमीपे" or "छ्वोपसमीपे".
Wait, look at the letter again:
Does it have a loop at the top left like 'त' or 'छ'?
Let's compare with 'छ' in L11: "प्रसृतविच्छि-".
In "वि