क्षेमकुतूहलम् (क्षेमशर्मा - १६वीं शती का शाही पाकशास्त्र एवं आहार-विज्ञान सटीक)

व्याजैर्हसन्त्येषा हि पोयिका ॥ ११४ ॥"
Wait, after 'रालन', there is a character: is it a question mark '?' or a poorly printed 'ं'?
Look at it: it has a curved top and a dot below! It really is a question mark '?' or an anusvara with a flourish!
Wait, in line 32 of Hindi:
"पोथिका तण्डुल ग्रहण व्याज से इस प्रकार हसते हुए कहती हैं कि..."
"आलन" (or आलनं) means mixing/thickening with rice flour (आलन/आलवन).
The question mark might be a typographical query by the editor/proofreader! Often in Chowkhamba/Khemraj editions, when a reading is doubtful, they insert a '?'!
Wait, let's look at the character: it has the exact shape of '?'. Yes, it's a '?'!

Let's check line 40:
"घनाम्रतक्रपाचिता सुपोयिकाऽऽज्यभर्जिता ॥ ११६॥"
Wait, is it "घनाम्लतक्रपाचिता"?
In line 40:
"घनाम्रतक्रपाचिता" or "घनाम्लतक्रपाचिता"?
Look at the character after 'ना':
It is 'म्ल'! 'म' with 'ल' subscript!
Notice the Hindi in line 44: "घन अम्ल तक्र