आत्मतत्त्वविवेक / बौद्धधिक्कार (उदयनाचार्य - महामहोपाध्याय पं. केदारनाथ त्रिपाठी सविस्तार हिन्दी व्याख्या सहित)

, क्त has that horizontal/slanted shape! So it's clearly युक्तेरनाक्षेपकं!
Wait, what about line 8:
"अनङ्गमिवरत्" vs "अनङ्गमितरत्":
Look at line 8:
अ न ङ्ग म् ? No, look at the glyph:
Wait, could it be "अनङ्गमिवरत्"?
Look at the character after म: it has an i-matra and then a letter with a belly. That letter is definitely व or त. If it's a typo in the original print, let's look at whether it's 'व': yes, it looks very much like 'िव' or 'ित'. In fact, it is printed "अनङ्गमिवरत्" (misprint for अनङ्गमितरत्). Let's print "अनङ्गमिवरत्" (or "अनङ्गमितरत्"). Actually, in scholarly transcriptions, writing what is printed is standard, or "अनङ्गमिवरत् [अनङ्गमितरत्]". But let's look at the letters:
Wait, look at: 'अनङ्गमितरत्' - could the letter after ङ्ग be 'मि'?
Wait! Look at letter 4:
Could letter 4 be 'मि'?
If letter 4 is 'मि', what is letter 5?
Letter 5 is 'त'!
Wait! Is letter 5 'त'?
YES! Look at 'त': it has the exact shape