वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 2. 3. 50.
446 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA ADH. 12 ]
objector to prove the similarity of the soul with the incarnation) is a
mere fallacy". That is, the argument:
The soul is a part of the Lord.
The incarnation is a part of the Lord
∴ the soul is equal to the incarnation,
evidently involves the logical fallacy of undistributed middle.¹
SŪTRA 50
"BECAUSE OF THE NON-RESTRICTION WITH REGARD TO THE
UNSEEN PRINCIPLE."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
On the doctrine of an all-pervasive soul, confusion is unavoidable
even if recourse be taken to the unseen principle, "because of the
non-restriction with regard to the unseen principle".
Vedānta-kaustubha
To the argument, viz. there is no confusion among all practical
transactions on our view too, since the unseen principle is the regulator,
—the author replies:
Confusion results indeed on the view of the opponents, "because
of the non-restriction with regard to the unseen principle", viz. to
whom may the unforeseen principle, generated in the vicinity of all
the all-pervasive souls, belong and to whom not.
COMPARISON
Rāmānuja and Śrīkaṇṭha
Interpretation same, only they direct this and the remaining
sūtras to the refutation of the Śaṁkarite view, and not to the view
of Kapila and others.
Baladeva
This is sūtra 50 in his commentary He begins a new adhikaraṇa
here (three sūtras), concerned with proving the mutual difference
among the individual souls. Thus, this sūtra means, according to
¹ G.B. 2.3.48, p. 228, Chap. 2.