वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 2. 3. 49.
ADH 12.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 445
on those views, there results a confusion (among karmas and so on
of the souls).
Vedānta-kaustubha
But the doctrines of an all-pervasive soul and the rest of Kapila,
Kaṇāda and so on are "fallacious merely", as they have no (scriptural)
basis, and as, on these views, there a confusion among all practical
transactions will result. By the term "and" it is indicated that
such teachers simply delude people.
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara
This is sūtra 50 in his commentary. He reads "ābhāsaḥ" in place
of "ābhāsāḥ". Interpretation absolutely different, viz. "(The indivi-
dual soul is) only a reflection (of Brahman)". Thus, here he develops
his doctrine of Pratibimba.¹
Rāmānuja
He reads "ābhāsaḥ", and interprets the sūtra thus: "(The view
that Brahman is obscured by limiting adjunct or nescience) is simply
a fallacy". He accepts the alternative reading "ābhāsāḥ" too and
points out that in that case the sūtra will mean: "(The various reasons
advanced by the supporters of the above doctrine) are simply
fallacies".²
Bhāskara
This is sūtra 50 in his commentary He substitutes "vā" in
place of "ca". He, also, like Rāmānuja, directs this sūtra against
the Śaṃkarite view, thus: "(Nesciences are) simply fallacies".³
Śrīkaṇṭha
He too directs this sūtra against the Śaṃkarite view, interpreting
it like Rāmānuja's second interpretation.⁴
Baladeva
This is sūtra 48 in his commentary He reads "ābhāsaḥ". The
same topic continued, viz. "(The reason adduced by the prima facie
¹ Ś.B. 2.3.50, pp. 642. ² Śrī. B. 2.3.49, p. 163, Part 2.
³ Bh. B. 2.3.50, p. 142. ⁴ Śk. B. 2.3.49, p. 101, Parts 7 and 8.