ताण्ड्य महाब्राह्मण / पञ्चविंश ब्राह्मण (सायण भाष्य एवं चिन्नस्वामी शास्त्री टीका सहित)

ेशेषः' (line 4): exact same matra!
So it is definitely 'से' or 'सै'? It looks like 'से'!
Wait, is it "सेनानुष्टुभो"?
Wait! Let's check:
"ककुप् प्रथमाथोष्णिगथ पुरउष्णिगनुष्टुप् सेनानुष्टुभो नयन्त्यच्छावाकसाम्नः ॥ २६ ॥"
Wait, could it be "सेयं"? No, it's 'ना'.
Wait, is it a typo in the printed edition for "सैता" or "सैषा" or is it literally printed as "सेनानुष्टुभो"?
In transcription, we MUST transcribe EXACTLY what is printed on the page!
Let's look at the printed glyphs:
क - कु - प् - प्र - थ - मा - थो - ष्णि - ग - थ - पु - र - उ - ष्णि - ग - नु - ष्टु - प् - से - ना - नु - ष्टु - भो
Line 32:
न - य - न्त्य - च्छा - वा - क - सा - म्नः - ॥ - २ - ६ - ॥
Yes, it literally says:
ककुप्प्रथमाथोष्णिगथ पुरउष्णिगनुष्टुप्सेनानुष्टुभो
नयन्त्यच्छावाकसाम्नः ॥ २६ ॥

Wait, let's look at spaces in line 31:
"