सहजोबाई की बानी: सहज प्रकाश (बेलवेडियर प्रेस, इलाहाबाद - सन्त चरनदास शिष्या)

' is round and connects to the letter.
In line 16: "ह्वै दीपक" -> here 'दीपक' has a FULL arc connecting to the 'द'!
Why would line 16 have "दोपक" in the first half and "दीपक" in the second half?
"बिना लोय १ दोपक सिष परसैं । ह्वै दीपक तिनहूँ कूँ दरसैं ॥"
Wait! Could it really be printed as 'दीपक' but with a broken type?
Yes, Belvedere Press is famous for worn-out lead types where the slender top curve of 'ी' breaks off, leaving what looks like 'ो' or a stump!
Wait, but if it's broken type, what is the word? The word is "दीपक" (lamp)!
Wait, could it be "दोपक"? In Braj, is "दीपक" ever written "दोपक"? No! "दीपक" is always "दीपक" or "दीवा" or "दीवरा". "दोपक" does not exist in Hindi/Braj!
Wait, what about "तीजो"? In Braj, "तीजो" IS a real word (तीसरा, तीजा, तीजो)!
What about "जल-लीक"? "लीक" is a real word.
Wait, let's look at "दीपक" in line 8:
If a human reads the page, they see "दीपक" (or maybe broken type). Should I transcribe "दीपक