मानसार शिल्पशास्त्र (प्रसन्ना कुमार आचार्य - प्राचीन भारतीय स्थापत्य, नगर-नियोजन व मूर्ति-शिल्प महाकोश)

34 MĀNASĀRA
lines 127, 130 we see चादित्य comes between the names ईश and कृशानु ।
Here चादित्य obviously stands for च शीप्यतम् which appears to be a
confused reading for शचीपतिम् implying usually इन्द्र but here चादित्य ।
191. (1) F. omits the passage from the second half of this lineto
the first half of line 196.
(2) A. B. तथा for रथ ।
194. Between 194 and 195 there seems a line missing, which is to
contain the name of a deity ; compare note (2) under 190 above.
200. I. याच for यक्ष्याच, suggested by A. B.
201. (1) For the four lines, 201-204, A. B. F. have only one line :
सर्वाभरणसंयुक्तं रक्तवस्त्रोत्तरीयकम् ।
(2) The second half of this line, which is missing from
all Mss., may be the passage within sqare bractats as suggested by
lines 160, 165, 175, 181, 185, 187, 192, 197, etc.
202. I. J. नि···ति for निष्क्रं ति, found in the margin but put under
interrogation. Compare note (2) under 201.
203. (1) सव्य is apparently used to imply right, which is, how-
ever, not usual.
(2) वरद is usually a pose of the hand ; but here it is used as
a प्रहरण or weapon.
206. (1) A. B. F. परं न्यास इसेवतो for the first pāda. (2) I. J. भेरण्या
or मकरारूढभरण्ण ।
210. I. देव महारूपं for देवं मृगारूढं, suggested by the other Mss.
213. A. B. F. धारिणीं ।
214. J. चन्द्रिकां च ।
216. J. युक्तमेवं । A. B. F. leave the second half in a lacuna.
A. B. F. omit the lines 217-219.
217. महान्त is a confused reading obviously for जयन्त who comes
between पर्जन्य and महेन्द्र (see lines 132, 133, etc.).
220. (1) I. J. प्रबधार other Mss. पवधारैः । (2) The dual in the
first half line may be explained by taking हस्तौ as understood. But in
the second half line it would be better to read वस्त्रोत्तरीयकम् ।