मानसार शिल्पशास्त्र (प्रसन्ना कुमार आचार्य - प्राचीन भारतीय स्थापत्य, नगर-नियोजन व मूर्ति-शिल्प महाकोश)

...
Wait! If the correction is (त्त्वा), then the word is भक्त्वा!
Then what was the misprint/manuscript reading?
It had भक्ते...? Look at the letters: भ क्त े? No, भ क्त े ब्बे?
Wait, could it be भक्तेब्बे?
Wait, look at the letters:
भ
क्त
े
ब or त?
Wait, look at the two shapes: they are identical, like त्त or ब्ब!
Wait, भक्तेत्ते? भक्तेब्बे? भक्तेद्दे?
Wait, in Devanagari, 'त्त्वा' has 'त्' + 'त्' + 'व' + 'ा'.
In manuscript, could someone have misread 'त्त्वा' as 'त्ते' or 'ब्बे'?
The typesetter literally composed what the manuscript had: भक्तेब्बे or भक्तेत्ते!
Wait, let's look at the letters:
It is भ then क with something? No, भक्त then े on the next letter?
Wait, the e-matra is on the letter after क्त!
That letter is: a vertical line with a rounded belly, and another belly: ब्बे!
Wait, does it say भक्तेब्बे?
Wait, look at the first prompt output from OCR or