कृषि-पाराशर (महर्षि पराशर - प्राचीन भारतीय कृषि, मृदा-परीक्षण, वर्षा-पूर्वानुमान व बीज-संस्कार)

..." or "विलिप्तं" or "विलिब्धं":
Look at the text:
Could it be "विलिप्तं"?
Wait, look at the letter again very carefully:
Is it "विलिग्धं"?
Is it "विलिब्धं"?
In some Hindi/Sanskrit dialects or texts, "विलिप्तं" might be written, but looking closely at the image:
It really looks like "विलिब्धं" or "विलिन्धं" or "विलब्धिं".
Wait, look at the character:
It has:
व + ि = वि
ल (la)
then िम (mi) + धं (dhaṁ)? No, िम doesn't look like that.
Wait, look at "लिखित्वा तु" on line 26 left:
The 'तु' is त + ु.
Look at "लाङ्गलं भियते" on line 25 left:
ला (lā) ङ्ग (ṅga) लं (laṁ) भि (bhi) य (ya) ते (te)
Wait, is that "भियते" or "भिद्यते"?
Look at "भियते": there is no 'द'. It is "भिद्यते" or "भियते"?
Line 25 left: लाङ्गलं भिद्यते!
Wait, look at "भिद्यते":
It has भि (bhi), then 'द्य' (dya