काव्यमीमांसा (महाकवि राजशेखर - कवि-रहस्य एवं देश-विभाग सटीक)

TWELFTH ADHYĀYA 223
l. 25. नटनेपथ्यम्। When a later poet borrows an idea from
earlier writing, but deviates totally from the original language, he
is compared here to an actor who appears in a different dress from
his original one.
l. 26. नेच्छइ पासासंकी is read as पाशाशंकी काओ णेच्छइ in the Gāthā-
saptatātī. (3-5.)
Page. 67.
ll. 2-5. The same idea, embodied originally in the Prākṛta
language in the first verse, is expressed in Sanskrit in the subse-
quent verse.
*[ l. 7. कान्ते (अमरु 101;)
l. 11. धन्यास्तु attributed to Vijjākā ;
l. 16. ततोऽरुण० attributed to Vālmīki;
l. 18. समं कुसुम०
cf. ततः कुमुदनाथेन गर्भणीगण्डपाण्डुना ।
उदयाद्रिशिरःसीम्नि निहितं पदमिन्दुना ॥ द्रोणपर्व. ]
ll. 15-19. In these two verses, the brightness of the moon is
described as similar to the paleness of a lady's cheek. But the
cause for the paleness of a lady's cheek, is mentioned in the first
verse as emaciation due to the influence of passion, and, in the
next, due to her being in a delicate condition. This is what is
called हेतुव्यत्यय.
ll. 20-26. The behaviour of the swans described in the first
verse, is transferred in the second verse to the deer.
Page. 68.
ll. 3-15. Combining in a concise manner, the imports of two
different sentences belonging to early writers, is called सम्पुट.
The river Narmadā is called here a नदी, but, in fact, it should
be called a नद as it flows towards the west.
शकुल=a kind of fish.
सरिताम् may be construed with अम्भः.