सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
कान्हड़दे प्रबन्ध (कवि पद्मनाभ - जालोर चौहान वीरगाथा, अलाउद्दीन खिलजी से युद्ध व जौहर इतिहास)

कान्हड़दे प्रबन्ध (कवि पद्मनाभ - जालोर चौहान वीरगाथा, अलाउद्दीन खिलजी से युद्ध व जौहर इतिहास)

Kanhadade Prabandha of Kavi Padmanabha with Commentary

कवि पद्मनाभ (सम्पादक: प्रो. कान्तिलाल बलदेवराम व्यास) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished354 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 320, कुल 354 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 320

परिशिष्ट २४५
Khaṇḍa I
Verse
53 हिंवडां छल नवि छांडूं BGK preferable to DJF reading [छयल भणइ नवि छांडउं],
being more relevant in the context and also more representative.
57 यांद BJ (K) pref. (cf. बंधीवाल I 154; चंदिण I 236, III 187); यांन CDG (F)
also is acceptable.
59 बाउसू K is the original reading (cf. वावसू F, वायसू G) > बायस a corruption.
60 मागनिसार emended from BD; मारनिसार C (FJ) is also acceptable.
62 पांढि K (B) pref. for rhyme; कोट AG is also acceptable.
66 मेल्यउ K (A) pref. as more fitting in the context; दीठउं C (DGJ),
however, is also acceptable.
70 धार D is the original reading > धाइ A, धार I₁ (ख), घोर G, गोर J, चोर B.
71 धीचउ A (BK) preferred to कीचउ D (CJG) as a more representative
reading.
74 हूहं डाक CK (A) pref. to हईंआढक B or हीयादानि D (J), as a metrically
more correct reading. (cf. I 200; III 73)
75 पिजूंरां K is pref. to पजूरां B as a Rājasthānī form. केलिहरा KJ is the
original form > केलहिरां G and केल्हेहरा D.
82 a Note—B reading वाजि वाजां अनि जुद हुआं सुहड संज्या मेल्लाबि is an interest-
ing example of scribal emendation of the text which was not
properly understood by the scribe. The correct meaning of the
words वाजा and जेटूआ in the original has eluded the scribe, who by
false analogy understood वाजा as 'musical instruments' and so
emended the preceding word वाला into वाजि. Similarly जेटूआ has
been read by him as जेह्या and then misconstrued by him as a
contraction of जेइ हुआ, which he promptly restored to जुद हुआ. In
this context चूड़ासमा would be entirely out of place, and is there-
fore, emended to सुहड संज्या, which is phonetically similar and
suitable to the context of the scribal restoration.
There are several examples of such scribal emendations,
unconscious or deliberately made by the scribe either due to
misreading or misunderstanding the original text or merely with
a view to improve it. Often an ordinary scribe like that of
DG or KL happens to preserve the text better than a sophis-
ticated one like that of J or C or B.
85 ऊलप्या D (J) pref. to उलट्टई A, and धमुक्या DK pref. to ध्राम्हरुइ A, धम्मुक्कि BC, as
the context requires a verb in the past tense.
89 याल्ति K appears to be the original reading > चाल्ति D, वाल्त FG.
पापलि (फेरी) ABFK pref. to पापरीया CJ, पापरीए D (E), पापरा G, as more
representative (cf. पापलि फिरी III 181).