व्यवहारमयूख (नीलकण्ठ भट्ट - पश्चिमी भारत की हिन्दू न्याय-संहिता एवं व्यवहार कोष)

38 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA [ B. II s. 15-16
[ M. p. 27 l. 35-p. 28 l. 20
even in the absence of both (the litigants) This rule holds good in
(disputes about) quadrupeds, bipeds and immoveable property In all dis-
putes about articles that are weighed (like gold) or that are counted or
measured (the judge) may require the witnesses to depose even in the
absence (of the subject matter of dispute) [but not in other cases
Tayorapi vinā kvacit—this means even in the absence of them both i e
of the plaintiff and the defendant¹ but in the presence of the subject of dis-
pute in some cases i e in the case of quadrupeds and the like, taulyam
means gold and the like that are capable of being weighed, gaṇimam
means coins and the like that can be counted out, meyam means rice
wheat and the like which can be measured abhāvepi means even in the
absence of the subject matter of suit, kriyākāraṇe means in judicial pro-
ceedings The same authority (Kātyāyana) says that in disputes relating
to homicide the deposition of witnesses should be taken in the presence of
(an image or temple of) Śiva:
In the case of the killing of living beings, (the judge) should make the
witnesses depose in the presence of Śiva when no trace (or remnant) of
the death is left, otherwise (i e. when traces exist) a witness should
not be made to depose thus (i e. in the temple of Śiva)²
*Tat means the deposition of a witness. It should be taken (in the
presence of Śiva) in the absence of any marks of the homicide, anyathā
(otherwise) means when there are marks of the killing The same
author (Kātyāyana) says
The king should not cause procrastination in recording the deposition of
witnesses. Great sin, viz failure in performing ones duty results from
procrastination
Nārada (p 91 v 169) says
Having summoned the witnesses and having bound them firmly by
oaths, (the judge) should separately question all the witnesses whose
character (conduct) is well-known and who are familiar with the matter
in dispute.

1. Vīr explains this as Nīlakaṇṭha does. But the Smṛticandrikā and Parāśara-
   mādhavīya explain differently viz. even apart from the two places (evidence may be
   taken) The two places where witnesses may depose are the court and in the case of
   immoveables near the property itself. Evidence in the case of homicide may be taken at
   the place of crime.
2. This is a somewhat difficult verse Some digests read in the presence of the dead
   body (śava for Śiva). This latter seems to be a better reading. Nīlakaṇṭha's way of
   taking tat as referring to deposition and connecting atīte with etakārya is far-fetched.
   He had to resort to it as he read Śiva-sannidhau Vide notes to V M. p 75 for details.
   42 (text)

S. II. s. 16-19 ] WITNESSES 39
M.p.281. 26-p. 29 l.26 ]
Vasiṣṭha says :¹
What was seen by the ( witnesses ) together should be deposed to by
them in the same way ( i. e they should depose simultaneously ); but
( what was seen ) by the witnesses separately should be related by each
separately. Where a matter has become known to witnesses at different
times ( the judge ) should make them depose one by one. This is the rule
( of examining witnesses ) laid down ( in the s'āstras ).
Manu ( 8 113, 102 ) says :
A² Brāhmaṇa should be made to swear by (his) truth, a Ksatriya by his
riding animal and weapons, a Vais'ya by his kine, grain and gold, a S'ūdra
by ( invoking on his head ) all the sins ( in case he deposed falsely ).
Brāhmaṇas who tend herds of kine, who are traders, mechanics or actors,
who are hired servants or money lenders, should be treated as S'ūdras
( for purposes of examination as witnesses ). Those³ who are fallen from
their proper duties, who subsist upon food given by others and yet who
desire the status of a man of the regenerate classes should be treated
like S'ūdras.
*The meaning ( of satyena ) is if you speak falsely, thy (merit due to) truth
will perish; such like should be the mode ( of oath for a Brāhmaṇa ) The
test for determining the ( truth or falsehood of the ) deposition of a
witness is declared thus :
If ( what a witness ) deposes is not less than ( what is affirmed by the
party citing him ) in respect of place, time, age, the substance ( dravya ),
the name, the caste, the measure, ( the judge ) should declare that the
matter in dispute has been proved ( by that party )
Yājñavalkya ( II. 78 ) lays down a rule for decision when witnesses contradict
each other
In case of contradiction the testimony of the majority should be accepted
( i e prevails ); if ( the witnesses ) are equally divided, the testimony of
the virtuous set and if there be a conflict ( of testimony ) among virtuous
witnesses, the testimony of the most virtuous should be accepted.
The same author ( Yāj II 76 ) prescribes the fine for not deposing after
having agreed to give evidence :

1. These two verses are ascribed to Kātyāyana by Aparārka These verses are
   not found in the printed Vasiṣṭhadharmaśāstra ( B. S. series) nor in its translation
   ( S. B E. vol. XIV ).
2. This verse occurs in Nārada also ( ṛṇādāna 199 ).
3. This verse is not found in Manu.
   *P. 48 ( text. )

40 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA [ S. II & 19-21
[ M p 22. l. 16-p. 30. l. 2
A person not giving evidence should be made by the king to pay the whole
debt together with a tenth (part) added thereto on the forty-sixth day
(after he is summoned).
Sarvam (the whole) means including the interest. sadaśabandhakam
means 'together with a tenth part' The Mitākṣarā states that the tenth
part is to be taken by the king and the debt together with interest is to be
taken by the creditor The same author (Yāj. II. 82) lays down the
punishment for one who having knowledge (of the matter in dispute) does
not agree to give evidence as a witness
He, who, having been called upon (along with others) to give evidence
as a witness conceals it from others under the influence of folly, should
be made to pay an eight fold fine; if (he be) a brāhmaṇa he should be
expelled ¹
Such a witness is to be fined eight times as much as the fine inflicted in case
of losing the suit But a brāhmaṇa unable to pay the fine is to be expelled
from the country and a kṣatriya and the like are to be made to do acts
proper for them (or to which they are accustomed) So says the Mitākṣ-
arā. Manu (8. 108) says
That witness who after giving evidence is seen to meet with (the mis-
fortunes of) disease fire or a relative's death within seven days (of
his deposition) should be made to pay the debt and a fine
*Yājñavalkya (II. 80) says
If even after some witnesses have deposed (as to a matter in dispute)
other witnesses more meritorious (than those already examined) or
double in number (of those already examined) depose to the contrary
then the witnesses first examined are false ones ²
Nārada (p 21 v 62) says
³After a judicial proceeding has been almost finished proof whether
documents or witnesses, would be useless unless the same had been
announced before ⁴

1. The Mit. on Yāj. shows that this verse rather applies to a person, who, having
   agreed to give evidence and being cited along with others to depose, afterwards at the trial
   denies to other witnesses that he is a witness. It is Yāj. II. 77 that is the proper verse to
   be cited for the purpose of laying down a punishment for him, who, though he knows the
   matter in dispute, does not agree to come forward as a witness.
2. Vide notes to V M. pp. 77-78 for explanation. This can only apply to a case
   where judgment has not already been pronounced, as th next verse of Nārada makes clear
3. Mandlik (p. 32) Dr Jolly (S. B. E. vol. 33 p 21 note) and Gharpure (p. 41)
   translate nirṇīta by the word decided But this is wrong. nirṇīta does not
   mean nirṇīta It literally means cleansed thoroughly i. e heard completely but
   not finally decided Besides that interpretation would be opposed to the rules about
   review of judgment. Vide notes to V M. pp 79-80.
4. Compare C. Pro. Code Order 7 rule 14 (2) and 18
   p 41 text]

S. II. 8. 22. ] WITNESSES 41
M. p. 80 ll. 2-11 ]
Yājñavalkya ( II 83 ) states that in some cases witnesses may depose falsely
and declares the penance therefor :
Where a man of the four castes would be liable to suffer death ( if the
truth were told ), there a witness may depose falsely; for purification from
that ( sin of falsehood ) an oblation of cooked rice should be offered to
Sarasvatī by the regenerate classes ¹
Viṣṇu ( S 17 ) prescribes the penance for a śūdra ( deposing falsely ) ' a
śūrad should give one day's fodder for ten cows ' Ārhāhikam means ' as
much as would be sufficient to feed them one day '
Here ends the section on witnesses
Now begins the section on ordeals §
That (an ordeal) determines a matter which cannot be decided by means
of human proof It is of two kinds according as it determines at once or
after some time Bṛhaspati ( p. 315 vv 45 ) mentions the varieties of the
first kind of ordeal ;

• Balance, fire, water, poison, kosa ( sacred libation of water ) as the
  fifth, the sixth is declared to be rice, seventh is a hot piece of gold, the
  eighth is the ploughshare and the ninth is known as springing from
  dharma.
  Yājñavalkya ( II. 95 ) declares that the first five are to be resorted to only
  in cases where the matter charged is of great value or is of a serious nature :
  These ordeals, viz balance, fire, water, poison, kosa are meant for
  clearing ( persons ) of serious charges ( or in valuable matters ), when the
  complainant ( or plaintiff ) declares himself ready to undergo fine ( follow-
  ing on a defeat in the trial by ordeal )
  S'īrṣakasthe ² means ' who undergoes the fine consequent upon defeat. '
  Pitāmaha says :
  ( The judge ) should prescribe the balance and the other ( four )
  ordeals for those who are proceeded against ( or complained against ) with
  assurance The ordeal of grains of rice and kos'a ( ordeal ) are to be
  employed in cases of doubt ( as to whether the defendant is the person
  who committed the wrong )

1. Sarasvatī being the goddess of speech it was appropriate that an offering should
   be made to her for deposing falsely. Compare Manu 8. 105.
2. The word ' S'īrṣakasthe ' is thus explained. S'īrṣam means the head i. e. the
   fourth stage of a judicial proceeding ( viz. the final judgment ) It therefore indicates
   fine which is imposed on the defeated party. Therefore the word means ' one who offer
   to undergo the fine of defeat '.

• P. 45 ( text ). § Both Stokes and Mandlik omit the treatment of ordeals.
  V. M. 6

42 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
Avaṣṭambhaḥ means certainty. Therefore the koṣa ordeal can be employed
in a charge made with certainty about the wrong-doer and also in one where
there is a doubt. The Kālikāpurāṇa says:
In charges of adultery, of theft, of intercourse with women who are
forbidden, when one is accused of having committed a mortal sin, and in
cases of serious (or violent) offences against the king, ordeals may be
employed. In serious charges (of adultery etc.), in civil wrongs (such as
non-payment of debt) and in cases where there is reviling, the king should
prescribe ordeals with an undertaking (on the part of the complainant or
plaintiff) to pay a fine (in case of opponent's success in the ordeal). In
grave charges such as that of adultery, and in cases where there are many
accusers (or plaintiffs) an ordeal may be prescribed in order that (the
person accused) may clear himself (of the accusation), but without an
undertaking (by the accuser) to pay a fine (in case of opponent's success in
the ordeal).
Agamyāḥ (in the first verse from the Kālikā-purāṇa) means women
other than others' wives, such as prostitutes and the like that are common
(to all who visit them)¹, the word śaste means the same thing as abhi-
śaste (i.e. charged with the commission of a great sin), sāhasaṁ means a
wrong done with violence (or force), avarṣaḥ means abuse, śiraḥ means
fine. *The attribute (adultery with) another's wife (to the word abhiśāpa)
is not literally intended, since what is intended to be repeated (or mentioned)
as a topic (about which something is to be predicated) is abhiśāpa (grave
charge)²; similarly the words 'where there are many' etc. also (are not to be
literally understood). Therefore, even in the absence of individual com-
plainants, an ordeal may be resorted to in the case of all charges (of mortal
sins). The mention of the purpose in the words śuddhiskāraṇāt (for the
purpose of clearing one's character) can also be well construed on this inter-
pretation and also the following general proposition (can be well understood
or construed).

1. This is a somewhat unnatural sense of agamyāḥ. That word generally refers
   to such women as are forbidden for sexual intercourse (on the ground of its being incest).
2. Here Nīlakaṇṭha refers to a Pūrvamīmāṁsā principle (which follows from
   Jaimini III. 1. 13-15). Vide notes to V. M. pp. 80-81. The conclusion of Jaimini is
   that though the Vedic sentence 'he cleans the graha (cup)' uses only the singular graha,
   yet all cups are to be cleansed, i.e., the singular number is not strictly intended and
   stands for the plural also. In the same way the word paradārābhiyuktādiṣu already
   occurred in the first verse. It is again repeated in the third verse where the provi-
   sion to be laid down (the vidheya) is that an ordeal may be resorted to for clearing
   one's character. The subject of which this is predicated is really abhiśāpa (a grave
   charge) and not paradārābhiyukta, the word paradārā being only an attribute (viśe-
   ṣaṇa may be taken to include other abhiśāpas also, just as the singular number in-
   cludes the plural). So also even if there be not many accusers, or even when no accuser, an ordeal
   may be resorted to for clearing one's character.
   P. 40 (text)

ORDEALS 43
An ordeal) may be resorted to in cases of sedition and in ( grave) sins¹
( Yāj II 96. ),
Nārada says :
An ordeal without an undertaking to pay a fine may be prescribed for
those who are suspected by kings (as offenders), who are pointed out by
thieves ( as their associates ) and who are intent on clearing themselves
An oath is divine proof which determines a cause after a time Nārada ( p
100 vv 248 and 250 for first verse and last half ) enumerates its varieties .
Truth², riding animals and weapons, kine, grains and gold, the feet of
a deity and one's father ( or ancestors ), one's gifts and meritorious
actions ( these may be sworn by ) One may ( solemnly ) touch the head
of one's sons, wife or friends ( by way of oath ) or in charges of all
kinds ( whether serious or trivial ) the drinking of kos'a ( sacred water )
may be prescribed These are proclaimed by Manu as oaths ( to be
resorted to ) in trifling matters
Kos'a, though it determines ( a dispute ) after the lapse of time, was enume-
rated among the first series ( i e among tulā &c above that decide a matter
immediately ), since it can be resorted to in serious charges also Yājñavalkya
( II 96 ) says :
One of the two may undergo ( the ordeal ) if he likes, while the other
may undertake to pay the fine ( in case of defeat by ordeal )
*This option can apply only if the complainant ( or plaintiff ) so desires, but
if he be unwilling, ordeals are to be prescribed for the accused (or defendant)³
alone, according to the dictum of Kātyāyana quoted in the Divya-tattva⁴ :
No one should ask the plaintiff or complainant to undergo ordeal ; those
who are adepts in ordeals should offer ordeals to him who is the defendant
( or accused ).
Now ( begins ) the treatment of ( the topic of ) those who are fit ( to
undergo ordeals ) Yājñavalkya ( II 98 ) says •

1. Yaj uses the general word pātaka and not paradārābhiśāpa ( which [is a particular
   sin ) when prescribing an ordeal without fine, hence in the Kālikāpurāna also the word
   paradārābhiśāpa is merely illustrative and includes other grave sins also (like brahmahatyā),
   2 With the first verse, compare Manu 8 113 'Satyena &c ' cited above Truth
   is to be taken with Brāhmanas, riding animals and weapons with Ksatriyas, kine &c
   with Vais'yas. Any one may swear by the feet of his ancestors or of a deity The verse
   ' he may touch &c ' does not occur in the printed Nārada Compare Manu 8 114.
   3 The general rule as stated by Kātyāyana above was that the complainant ( or
   plaintiff ) was not to undergo a divya, but that it was the accused or defendant who was to
   do so But if the complainant chose he could himself undergo the ordeal and the defendant
   or accused may then undertake to pay the fine.
2. This is one of the works of Raghunandana,

• P, 47 ( text )

44 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
The (ordeal of) balance (is prescribed) for women, minors, old men,
the blind, the decrepit, brāhmaṇas and the diseased; fire or water (ordeal)
is prescribed for (Kṣatriya and Vaiśya respectively) and for s'ūdra
seven yavas of poison.
Strī means (any woman) without reference to caste, age or any particular
condition. bāla means a person of the age of sixteen and also of any caste;
an old man is one who is beyond eighty years of age. Balance alone out of the
several ordeals is prescribed for a brāhmaṇa at times which are common to
all divyas as detailed later ¹ but when it is the proper time for fire and other
ordeals, they also can be administered (to brāhmaṇas). It is hence that
Pitāmaha says:
Clearing off (from guilt) by means of the ordeal of kośa is prescribed
for all the (four) varṇas (principal castes). All these (nine ordeals)
are proper for all persons, but not poison (ordeal) for a brāhmaṇa.
The Kālikā-purāṇa says:
For the last of the varṇas ² (i. e. for the s'ūdra) should be offered
(the ordeal of) the heated golden māṣa.
Nārada (p. 101 v. 255 and p. 118 vv. 313-315 for last four verses) says:
(The judge) should always examine by (the ordeal of) balance eu-
nuchs, those devoid of courage (or mettle), those whose minds are in
distress on all sides, minors, old men, diseased persons and women.
*Poison is not prescribed (as an ordeal) for women nor water; (the
judge) should consider the hidden truth about them by means of the
balance, the kośa and the like. Clearing (of guilt) by water is not
prescribed for those who are diseased (or distressed), nor poison for those
who suffer from biliousness; the ordeal of fire is not prescribed for those
who suffer from white leprosy, who are blind and who have bad nails.
Women and minors are not to be plunged (in water as an ordeal) by
those who know dharmaśāstra, and also those who are diseased, old or
weak. (The judge) should not plunge in water those who are devoid
of energy, who are ground by disease and those who are distressed; if
they plunge in water they might die at once since they are known to have
little vitality; these should never be plunged in water (as an ordeal),
though they come (before the court) charged with heinous crimes; nor
should (the judge) cause them to carry fire (as ordeal), nor should he
clear them with poison.
115. Vide the verse of Pitāmaha quoted below "Caitra...... these are the months
common &c.
116. According to the Vīr., varṇāntya means one who borders on the varṇas i. e.
a Mleccha.
P. 43 (text)

ORDEALS 45
Viṣṇu (Viṣṇu Dh S 9 20 ) says:
Water should not be prescribed for the phlegmatic, for the diseased, for
timid people, for those who suffer from difficulty in breathing and from
cough¹.
Kātyāyana says:
Fire is not (prescribed) for those who work in iron (blacksmiths),
nor water for fishermen nor should poison be ever offered (as ordeal) to
those who know magic spells and yoga (The judge) should not prescribe
the ordeal of rice for one who is observing a vow or one who suffers from
a mouth disease
*Vratī means 'one who observes the vow of subsisting on milk and the like.'
Pitāmaha says:
Kośa should not be offered by the wise to those addicted to wine and
women, to gamblers and to those who are unbelievers (atheists).
Nārada (p 117 v 332) says:
The offering of kośa (as an ordeal) should be avoided as regards him
who has once been found guilty of a grave crime, who is destitute of
dharma, who is ungrateful, who is impotent or who always finds faults,
who is an atheist and who is sinful (or in whom faults exist).
Kātyāyana says:
The determination (of disputes) among the untouchables, among the
lowest people, among slaves, among mlecchas who are evil-doers and
among those who are born of unions in the reverse order of castes (i. e
unions of females of higher castes with males of lower castes) should not
be carried out by the king (in his court); on occasions (of dispute among
them) he should direct them to undergo ordeals well-known among
them.
Tatprasiddhāni means 'balance, serpent and the like' If the person who
should undergo an ordeal is unable to do so, the same author (Kātyāyana (
as quoted in the Divyatattva says:
(The king or judge) should prescribe the proper (ordeal) without
conflict with the time or the place. In case of inability (lit accident,
reverse of fortune) ordeal should be carried out through a substitute. This
is the rule (of law)
Anyena hārayet mean 'the ordeal should be performed by a substitute;'
viparyaye means 'when the person to undergo the ordeal is unable to do

1. This is not in the original a verse but a 'prose sūtra, while Nīlakaṇṭha's reading
   makes it a verse. Viṣṇu reads 'na śleṣmavyādhyarditānām bhīrūṇām ..codakam'.
   *P. 49 (text)

46 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
20 (The judge) should prescribe the proper (ordeal). When it is
positively known that a person at one time was guilty of patricide or of some
mortal sin and subsequently (he is charged with another crime) and
it is doubtful (whether he committed it) even in such case the same author
(Kātyāyana) says that an ordeal must be performed by such a person
through a substitute alone.
"In case of those who are guilty of killing their mother father a brā-
hmaṇa a teacher (or elder relative) an old man a woman and a
minor, particulary in the case of those who are guilty of committing one
of the great sins and who are atheists, in the case of those who wear
heretical sect marks, in the case of lascivious women and of those who
are experts in magic spells and yogic practices, in the case of those who
are born of the mixture (or confusion) of castes and those who are
habitual sinners, when these people are charged again with those very
reprehensible crimes the king who is devoted to dharma should take
care not to prescribe an ordeal for them (to be undergone in their own
persons). (The king) should prescribe an ordeal to be undergone by
worthy persons appointed by these very (sinners). Where worthy persons
cannot be found (willing to undergo an ordeal for them) they should be
cleared by their own people (i. e relatives should undergo the ordeal for
them)¹
Svakaiḥ means by their relatives.
Now as to the time (for an ordeal) Pitāmaha says
Caitra Mārgaśiras and Vaiśākha, these are months common (to all
ordeals) and not contrary to them. The balance (ordeal) is declared
to be (proper) for all seasons but it should be avoided when the wind
is blowing. The fire (ordeal) is declared to be proper in the seasons of
śiśira hemanta and varṣā (rain). Water (ordeal) is proper for
śarad (autumn) and grīṣma (summer) and poison in hemanta and
śiśira (i. e. December to March).
The express mention of hemanta and śiśira for the poison ordeal serves
to indicate other seasons also (i. e. it is merely illustrative and not exhaus-
tive) since it will be declared below "In the rainy season the quantity (of
poison to be administered in ordeal) is only four yavas" (Nārada p 116 v
324). Nārada says
Kośa (ordeal) may be offered at any time and the balance also at
all seasons.

1. The verse does not absolutely prohibit the prescribing of an ordeal for these men;
   what is forbidden is that they are not to undergo an ordeal in their own persons, but
   through a substitute appointed by them.
   P. 50 (text).

• Pitāmaha says :
  Examination by fire (ordeal) should be made in the forenoon and
  the balance also in the forenoon.¹ Water should be offered in the noon
  by one who desires to secure the truth about dharma. Purification by
  kośa is prescribed for the first part of the day (forenoon), but poison
  should be given at night in the last watch, (as then it is) very cool.
  Respectable people say that these ordeals should be resorted to on Sunday.²
  Now as to the place (of ordeals). Pitāmaha says :
  The balance should always be placed facing the east and motionless in
  a purified place, either in a famous temple of some God (such as Indra)³,
  or in the court-hall, at the royal gate or in a public square.
  Nārada (p 104 v 265) says :
  In the court room, at the royal gate and in the square of a temple
  (ordeal should be performed).
  Kātyāyana says :
  In the case of those men who are accused of the great sins, (the
  ordeal) should be performed in indrasthāna (place where Indra's banner
  is worshipped or some holy shrine) and at the royal gate in the case of
  those who are guilty of treason (or sedition). Ordeal should be offered
  in the public square to those who are born of unions in the reverse order
  of castes (i. e. unions of males of lower castes with women of higher
  castes). The wise declare that in matters other than these (ordeals
  should be performed) in the midst of the court hall.
  Nārada says :
  When ordeals are administered at an improper time and place and are
  undergone by the litigants outside (the village, i. e. away from the public
  gaze) they always fail (to be decisive) as to the matters in dispute;
  there is no doubt about this.⁴

1. According to the Mit. the day of twelve hours is to be divided into three parts,
   the first part of four hours being called pūrvāhna (forenoon), the second madhyāhna
   (noon) and the third aparāhna (afternoon).
2. Vide Mit. on Yāj. II. 97.
3. The word 'Indrasthāne' is explained 'as some well-known temple' by the Smṛti-
   candrikā, while the Divyatattva explains it as 'the place where the banner festival in honour
   of Indra is held.' This last festival, where a banner in honour of Indra was worshipped,
   continued from the 8th to the 12th day of the bright half of Bhādrapada. Vide Bṛhatsam-
   hitā chap 43.
4. Dr Jolly' (S. B. E. vol. 38 p. 250) is not right in translating the last half as 'they
   constitute a deviation from the proper course of a law suit'. The Smṛticandrikā and Parā-
   śara-Mādhavīya say 'if the proper place and the like are disregarded, the ordeal loses its
   validity, this is declared in the words adeśakālā', &c.

• P. 51 (text)

48 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
*Now (begins) the procedure of the rites common to all ordeals.
Pitāmaha says
The judge knowing the dharma should after turning to the east and
folding his hands, utter the following words and invoke the gods in the
manner following come come, oh revered dharma and sit down (for
decision) in this ordeal together with the guardians of the worlds¹ and
the (eight) Vasus, the (twelve) Ādityas and the bands of Maruts.
Having invoked dharma to be present in the balance he should after-
wards assign (proper places) to the subordinate (deities)² The same
author (Pitāmaha) says
Having placed Indra in the east, Yama in the south Varuṇa in the
west and Kubera in the north, he should assign Agni and the other
guardians of the worlds to the intermediate points (south-east south-west
&c.) Indra is yellow Yama dark Varuṇa of the lustre of crystal,
Kubera has a golden complexion and so has Agni So also Nirṛti is dark
and Vāyu is said to be smoke-coloured, Īśāna is red (The judge) should
contemplate upon these deities in these forms in order The wise (judge)
should invoke the Vasus to the southern side of Indra Dhara Dhruva Soma
Āpaḥ Anila Nala, Pratyūṣa Prabhāsa--these are enumerated as the eight
Vasus The place of the Ādityas is between that of Indra and that of Īśāna
(i.e between the east and the north-east) Dhātṛi Aryaman Mitra, Varuṇa
Aṁśa Bhaga Indra § Vivasvat Pūṣan Parjanya as the tenth then Tvaṣ-
ṭṛ then Viṣṇu though born last not the least (but the highest of the twelve
Ādityas) these are the twelve Ādityas enumerated by name To the west
of Agni is known the place of the Rudras. Vīrabhadra Śambhu, high famed
Giriśa Ajaikapād Ahirbudhnya Pinākin Aparājita Bhuvanādhīśvara,
Kapālin the lord of people Sthāṇu and the great Bhava--these are known
to be the eleven Rudras (The judge) should assign a place for the
Mātṛs between Yama and the evil spirit (Nirṛti i e between south and
south-west) Brāhmī Māheśvarī Kaumārī Vaiṣṇavī Vārāhī Māhendrī,
Cāmuṇḍā together with her attendants (these are the seven mātṛs) The
place of Gaṇeśa is known to be the north of Nirṛti and the place of the
Maruts is said to be to the north of Varuṇa Gaganasparśana Vāyu
Anila Māruta Prāṇa Prāṇeśa and Jīva--these are declared to be the
seven Mārutas. The wise (judge) should invoke Durgā to the north of
the balance These deities are to be worshipped after taking their res-
pective names †Having offered worship to Dharma beginning with

1. For the Lokapālas vide Manu &c.
2. Dharma is the principal deity to be invoked in the balance and the other deities from
   Indra to Durgā (as detailed in the following verses) are subsidiary

• P 63 (text). § P 63 (text). † P 64 (text)

arghya¹ and ending with ornaments in due order, he ( the judge ) should
then get ready for the subsidiary deities the worship beginning with arghya
and ending with ornaments and should offer ( to dharma and the subsi-
diary deities ) the service beginning with sandalwood and ending with
naivedya.² He ( the judge ) should light fires in the four principal
quarters and offer oblations at the hands of persons versed in the Vedas
of clarified butter, havis ( boiled rice ) and fuel sticks that are the mate-
rials of homa He should perform homa with the ( sacred ) Gāyatrī,
praṇava ( the sacred syllable om ) and add svāhā at the end
Havis means 'caru' ³ The revered Mīmāṁsaka from the Gauḍa country
( viz Raghunandana ) says in his Divyatattva that clarified butter, boiled rice
and fuel sticks are to be offered to the same deities (dharma as principal and
the rest as subsidiary ), they are to be thrown on to the fire together ( and
not separately ) as in the case of the sānnāyya offerings ⁴ But this is not
correct In this case it is impossible to have a single joint performance
(tantratā), as the means of offering (the three substances) are different viz.
the sruva ladle is (the proper means) of offering ājya as said in the sentence
'he ( the priest ) divides with the sruva', the sruc is ( the proper means)
of offering caru ( boiled rice ) as follows from the sūtra of Āśvalāyana ⁵
and the like to the effect 'he covers once ( with ghee the juhū ladle )', 'he
divides off two portions of the boiled rice from the middle and the part of it
to the east,' 'he sprinkles ghee over the boiled rice and over the portion
divided off,' 'this is the characteristic procedure for all avadānas ( offer-
ings )'; and as the hand is the proper means for offering fuel sticks on
account of its fitness In the case of the sānnāyya offerings ( curds and
milk ), a single joint performance ( offering of the two materials together ) is
proper, as the juhū ( ladle ) is the means of offering both The same
author ( Pitāmaha ) says.
Having written down on a leaf ( paper ) the subject-matter for
which the defendant ( or accused ) is proceeded against, the leaf should
be placed on the head ( of the person undergoing the ordeal ) together
with the following mantra

1. Arghya is water offered by way of honour.
2. This is some eatable, such as raw-sugar &c.
   3 Vide notes to V M. p 89 for explanation of caru.
3. Vide notes to V M p 90 for sānnāyya and the proposition of Raghunandana explain-
   ed in detail Sānnāyya is a name given to a mixture of curds and milk offered to Indra or
   Mahendra. As the deity is the same they are offered together Therefore Raghunandana
   argues that the three substances ājya, havis and samidh should be offered together For
   detailed exposition of this complicated passage and of sruva, sruc, juhū, sāmarthya and
   tantra vide notes to V M pp 91--93.
4. Compare Āśvalāyanagṛhyasūtra I, 10. 18 and I, 7. 10 -12 for the passages referred
   to here.
   V. M. 7

50 ÚKHA
*The mantra is ( Mahābhārata ² Ādiparva 74. 30 )
The sun ¹ the moon the wind fire heaven and earth waters the
heart Yama, day and night the two twilights and dharma know
( see or mark ) the doings of men.
Nārada says
The judge being a brāhmaṇa, who is versed in the Vedas and the
Vedāṅgas ( subsidiary lores such as grammar phonetics astronomy ritual,
metrics, etymology ) endowed with learning and character with an un-
ruffled heart free from malice whose word is true who is pure and
vigilant who is intent upon doing good to all creatures who has fasted
who wears wet garments, who has brushed his teeth and who has per-
formed the worship of all deities according to the prescribed rules ( should
administer ordeals )
Yājñavalkya ( II 97 ) says
(The judge) having summoned at sunrise ( the person who is to undergo
ordeal ) who has bathed and wears wet garments who has observed a fast
( the previous day ) should administer all ordeals in the presence of the
king and the brāhmaṇas.
Pitāmaha also says
Ordeals should always be administered to persons who have fasted either
one night or three nights who are purified and whose garments are wet
The same author (Pitāmaha) says
The king surrounded by good men should esteem this ( mode of ) puri-
fication and should please sacrificial priests family priests and preceptors
with gifts. The king who causes this to be done after enjoying sweet
pleasures, secures great fame and becomes fit for absorption into Brahma
Here ends the section on ordeals.
§ Now ( begin ) the rules for the balance ( ordeal )
Pitāmaha says
The king should cause to be constructed a balance-shed broad high
and white-washed, sitting wherein ( the person undergoing ordeal ) would
not be within reach of dogs candālas and crows, it should have doors and
contain grains ( rice &c ) should be guarded by servants should have
drinking water and the like and should not be untenanted
1 Compare Manu 8 101 for a similar verse.
2 P 53 (text) § P 56 (text).

RDEALS 51
Nārada ( p. 103 v ] ) says :
( The timber employed ) should be of the Khadira tree, but not the
white variety and should not be worm-eaten
Śuklavarjitam means ' excluding the white Khadira '
(The timber) should be blackwood, or in its absence teak but without
hollows, or Añjana, the inner part of Tindukī, Tiniśa or red sandalwood.
But Mādhava reads '( the timber should be ) of Arjuna, Tilaka, Aśoka,
Tiniśa and red sandalwood.'
The king ( or judge ) should select such trees as these for making a
balance ( Nārada p 104 v 265 )
Evam-vidhān means according to Madana ' these and other sacrificial
( sacred ) trees also such as Udumbara ' Hence Pitāmaha says •
Having bowed to the guardians of the worlds, and having cut down the
sacrificial tree ( Khadira ), the balance should be prepared by the wise,
after reciting the mantra as in the case of ( making ) a sacrificial post ;
*and mantras addressed to Soma¹ and Vanaspati should be muttered in a
low voice when the tree is cut
Yūpavat means after reciting the mantra ' Oh, herb, save this sacrificer
(Vāj S IV I.) As the mantras addressed to Soma and Vanaspati are to be
muttered and have an unseen result, they are both to be repeated ( i e.
there is no option ) ² The saumya mantras are well known The Vānas-
patya mantra is ' Oh Vanaspati (tree), may you grow with a hundred
branches' ( Rgveda III 8 11 )' The line ' mantraḥ saumyo vānaspatyaḥ
&c ) merely reiterates what already follows from the extended application
( atideśa ) contained in the word ' yūpavad' ³ Pitāmaha says
The ( beam of ) the balance was to be four cubits ( in length ) and
the two supports ( of the beam from which the balance was suspended )
were to be of the same length ( above ground ) ; the distance between the
two supports was to be two cubits or a cubit and a half
Vyāsa says .

1. Ṛgveda I. 91 is a hymn of 28 verses which are all addressed to Soma. The
   saumya mantra may either be ' somo dhenum ' ( I 91 20 ) or ' āpyāyasva sametu' (I 91. 16).
2. This is based on the Pūrvamīmāṁsā XII. 4. 1, for an explanation of which vide
   notes to V M. p. 94.
3. The mantra 'vanaspate' is recited when a tree is cut for making a yūpa So
   when it is said that a sacred tree is to be cut with recitation of mantras as in the case of
   yūpa, it is not necessary to say expressly that the mantra ' vanaspate' should be uttered
   in a low voice But the verse does expressly say so It therefore does not lay down any-
   thing new, but only repeats what is already known. Atideśa is a principle in the Pūrva-
   mīmāṁsā Anuvāda is a variety of Arthavāda and is opposed to vidhi,
   * P. 57 (text ).

52 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
The two supports (or columns) were to be implanted in the ground
for two cubits.
Pitāmaha says
The balance (i. e. its beam) should be a square (log) firm and
straight and three (iron rings) should be fastened on to it with care.
The same author (Pitāmaha) says
After suspending from the two ends (of the beam of the balance) two
pans, he (the judge) should arrange on both the pans darbha grass with
their points turned towards the east. In the pan to the west he should
have the person (undergoing ordeal) weighed and in the other pure earth,
not mixed with bricks, ashes, stones, broken pieces of vessels or bones.
*Nārada (pp 105-106 vv 271-72) says
Having firmly suspended two pans from the two hooks attached to
(the two ends of the beam of the) balance, he should have the person
(undergoing ordeal) weighed in one pan and gravel (or stones) in the
other. He (the judge) should have the person (undergoing ordeal)
held in (the pan on) the northern side and stones on the southern; he
should have the basket (pan) filled with bricks, dust and lumps of earth.¹
The same author (Nārada p 262 vv 27-28) lays down the mode of
examining (a person by balance ordeal)
The examiners should bring the balance on the same level with the two
pendants² (hanging down from the two arches) and (a little) water
should be poured over the upper part of the (beam of the) balance by
clever men. That balance was to be known [as sama (perfectly hori-
zontal) on which the water so poured would not run down.
Pitāmaha describes the (suspending of) two pendants for (ascertaining the)
horizontal position (of the beam)
Two arches should also be raised on both sides of the beam. They
should always be ten aṅgulas higher than the balance. Two pendants
should be suspended hanging down from the arches tied with a string
and made of clay and touching the upper surface of the (beam of the)
balance.
1 Reading this verse with Pitāmaha it follows that bricks, dust and stones are not
totally forbidden as material for weighing the man against. What is forbidden is the
mixing together of all these. One may fill the pan either with earth or stones or bricks but
not with all together.
2 As said by Pitāmaha the two arches were to be one from the other at a distance
below which the person went in. They were to touch each other at the top. The
balance and from the arches two pendants of clay tied to an iron pin at the end of a fine
beam was to be kept in such a position that its condition could be easily perceived. v. s.
p. 25 (text).

ORDEALS 85
Pitāmaha says •
Having first weighed the man ( to be tried by ordeal ) and having
made him get down from it, the balance being always adorned with
banners and pennons, ( the judge ) knowing the mantras should then
invoke the deities in the manner described ( above ) to the accompaniment
of the beating of musical instruments and drums and with sandalwood
paste, flowers and unguents
*Nārada ( p. 252 v 29 ) says •
He ( the judge ) should first worship the balance with red sandal-wood
paste, red flowers, with curds, cakes and husked grains of rice mixed with
red powder and then he should honour the respectable people (assembled
there )
Yājñavalkya ( 2 100-102 ) says :
When the person complained against sitting in ( one pan of the )
balance is equal ( in weight ) to the things ( clay &c ) against which he is
weighed, a line ( with chalk ) should be drawn ( on the arch showing the
position of the pans ) by those who are experts in handling the balance
and the person being made to get down from the pan should invoke the
balance in the following words ' Oh balance, you are the abode of truth,
you were formerly created by the gods ( for this purpose ), therefore,
beneficent one, declare the truth, and free me from this ( cloud of ) suspi-
cion Mother, if I am a sinner, then take me lower, if I am pure, carry
me upwards '
Nārada ( p 106 v 276 ) says
Having put him under ( spiritual ) restraint by exhortations ( about
the results of untruth ), the judge should again place him ( in the balance )
after putting upon his head a writing ( about the matter in dispute )
when the wind is not blowing and there is no rain
Samayaṁ parigṛhya mean ' having restrained with oaths. ' Viṣṇu ( Viṣṇu
Dh S 10 9 ) describes the oaths
Those (hellish) worlds which fall to the lot of those who kill brāhmaṇas
and of those who are false witnesses will be yours, if you hold the balance
falsely
Nārada ( p 107 vv 278-279 , Viṣṇu Dh S 10 10-11 ) mentions that at the
time of again sitting in the pan there is to be an invocation
‡ You know the evil and meritorious deeds of all beings You alone
know, oh god, what mortals do not know This man accused of a wrong
in this judicial proceeding is weighed in you Therefore you will be
*P. 59 ( text ), ‡P. 60 ( text ).

57 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA
pleased to save, according to the dictates of dharma, him who is now
under suspicion. You surpass in truth gods, demons and mortals, oh
lord, your word is true in making clear what is pure and sinful The
sun, the moon ( the same verse as above at p 50 )
Pitāmaha says
A worthy brāhmaṇa proficient in astronomy should examine the time
The time of five vināḍīs ¹ should be calculated by those who are
experts in measuring the time of examination by ordeals. The king
should appoint as superintendents ( over the calculation of time ) worthy
brāhmaṇas who speak out as they see who are learned pure not covetous
All the superintendents ( the brāhmaṇas ) declare to the king the puri-
fication ( by ordeal ) or otherwise
Vināḍyah means 'palas' in accordance with the smṛti
The period required for ( repeating ) ten long letters is called prāṇa
and vināḍikā is equal to six prāṇas
Nārada ( p 207 v 283 ) says
If the person weighed in the balance is seen to go up ( i e to be
lighter than what he formerly weighed ) there is no doubt that he is in-
nocent but a man who weighs the same or goes down ( i e weighs
more ) would not be innocent
Vṛddhi means going up hāni means going down Pitāmaha says :
The man whose guilt is light weighs the same while he whose guilt
is great goes down ( weighs more )
*Guilt is ( said to be ) light when the offence is the first one and not done
of set purpose, but where by the very words of the writing put on the head
( of the person weighed ) it is ascertained that it was a first offence and
committed without set purpose and where the only question was whether he
was a guilty person if after undergoing the ordeal he weighs the same, the
ordeal has again to be gone through since it is impossible ( in such a case )
to infer ( from the fact of the same weight in both cases ) that the guilt
was light Hence Bṛhaspati ( p 317 v 19 ) says
He who weighs the same as before should be weighed again and he
who goes up ( weighs less ) becomes victorious
Kātyāyana mentions other reasons for again going through the ordeal
The person should be again weighed when the scales snap or the ( beam
of the ) balance breaks or the ropes give way and when there is a doubt
about the innocence ( of the man )

1 A vināḍī ( or pala ) is built thus time spent in reciting 60 long syllables, 60
Vināḍīs make a Ghaṭī or Ghaṭikā the prāṇa was to ...
P 51 (text)

ORDEALS 55
Vāysa says :
When the pan breaks, or when the beam of the balance or the two
hooks break, when the ropes give way or the transverse beam (or the
support) gives way, the king should then again resort to purification (by
the same ordeal)
But this applies to cases where the breaking is due to some visible cause;
when however the breaking is purely accidental, (the person undergoing
ordeal) is certainly guilty, as declared in another smṛti
When the pans or the beam of the balance or the hooks or the ropes
or the transverse beam breaks, the king should declare the guilt (of the
man weighed)
Kakṣa means 'the bottom of the scales'; akṣa means 'the support of the
balance placed across the columns' The older writers (or eastern writers)
say that only the weighing is to be repeated and not the whole procedure;
but Madana says that the whole procedure is to be repeated (at the time of
the second weighing) because the defect (in the act of purification by
ordeal) is not removed in this way (by mere repetition of the weighing)¹
*Now (begins) the procedurs of the rites (of the balance ordeal). The
person, who is to perform the ordeal, should on an auspicious day in the
morning approach one of the trees referred to above, should cut the tree with
the mantra 'oh herb, save this person' (Vāj. S 4 1.), should mutter (the
mantra) 'somo dhenum' (Ṛg I. 91 20) (of which) Gautama (is
the sage), Soma (the deity), Triṣṭubh (is the metre) and (which) is
employed in japa (muttering of prayers) and the mantra 'Oh tree, (grow)
with a hundred branches' (Ṛg III 8. 11) of which Gāthina Viśvāmitra,
vanaspati, triṣṭubh (are respectively the sage, the deity and the metre)
and which is employed in japa. After having bowed to the lokapālas viz.
Indra and the rest one by one, he should erect a balance, (with a beam)
four cubits long, of the thickness of four aṅgulas, having four faces, rounded
in the middle and at the ends and (with a diameter) of four aṅgulas,
having in the middle on its upper surface and at the two ends but on their
lower surface three hooks or rings Then some say that he should construct
a place seven or five cubits square raised (from the ground) to the extent
of four aṅgulas Then on that (raised) spot or on any other purified
place two square pillars six cubits long should be driven into the ground to
the extent of two cubits, having pared tops beyond the length of six cubits
(on which the transverse beam was to be placed from which the whole
balance was to be suspended) Above the ground four cubits (of the

1. The view of Madana is in accordance with the Kātyāyana-śrauta-sūtra I. 7. 28.
   It is not clear what view Nīlakaṇṭha himself holds He merely places the two views in
   juxtaposition. But from the fact that he places Madana's view last and since he generally
   follows the Madanaratna it may be inferred that he held the latter view,

• P. 62 (text)

pillars) plus the portion of the pared tops thereof (were to remain). The
distance between the pillars was to be two cubits or one cubit and a half.
On those two tops was to be placed (transversely) a beam having in its
middle but on the lower surface a support in the form of an iron hook ring
or catch for holding the (beam of the) balance. From that (transverse)
beam (on the pillars) was to be suspended the beam of the balance by
means of the hook or catch on the upper part of it. At the end of the beam
of the balance were to be tied two pans by means of three ropes each.
To the east of the balance two posts at a distance of two cubits were to be
fixed into the ground towards the north and south and over them is to be
placed a log* with its inside outwards. This is to be the toraṇa (outer
frame arch). And it should be higher by ten aṅgulas than the balance
frame. A similar one should be erected also to the west (of the
balance). Two spherical pendants of clay should be tied with a string sus-
pended from the (two sides of the) frame-work and made to touch the
ends of the (beam of the) balance in order to ascertain the horizontal
position (of the beam). On the two pans should be spread kuśa grass with
their ends turned eastward. Then on a Sunday the judge who has observed
a fast for a day should place in the western pan the person to be cleared (of
his guilt by ordeal) who has taken a bath along with his garments after
sunrise who has observed a fast for a day or for three days in case of ability
to do so and in charges of grave sins, he (the judge) should then put in
the pan to the east stones bricks clay or the like and so weigh that the two
pans stand even. Truthful brāhmaṇas and goldsmiths should examine this
(viz the equipoise of the balance) by means of sprinkling water (on the
beam of the balance). Then in order to make sure of the position (of the
pan in which the person sat) reached at the time of the weighing (by the
pan in relation to the toraṇa) the judge should draw a line (on the toraṇa
with chalk &c.) and should make the person (undergoing ordeal) get down
(from the pan). Then the person to be cleared having named the time
and the place and having declared his intention in the words "I shall perform
such and such an ordeal in order to proclaim my innocence" should
present clothes and and the like to the judge and four priests. The rever-
smārta-bhaṭṭāchārya (i.e. Raghunandana) says that svastivācana¹ and
the like should also be performed. And the judge with folded hands and
to the accompaniment of the beating of drums should invoke dharma (to be
present) in the balance in the following manner:-
Om come come revered dharma and enter this ordeal together with
the Lokapālas, Vasus, Ādityas and tribes of Maruts.
He should then invoke the subsidiary deities. The verse Indrāya svāhā
(Ṛv. I. 11. 1 of which) Mandiṣṭha is Indra and Agne svāhā (are the

1 This consists in the priest saying "Oṃ svasti"; and the would-be
svasti! and the priest saying "Oṃ svasti" and the like (vide Nirṇayasindhu
p. 63 [text]).

ORDEALS 57
sage, deity and metre respectively ) is employed in invoking Indra In the
same manner is to be understood the employment (of the following mantras)
everywhere Having invoked Indra towards the east ( of the balance ) by
mantra 'all ( increase might of ) Indra' ( Rg I 11 1 ) (and with the words )
'Indra, come here and stay here', he ( the judge ) should contemplate upon
Indra as yellow 'Yamāya somam' (of which ) Yama, Yama and Anu-
stubh* ( are respectively the sage, the deity and metre )¹ Having in-
voked Yama to the south with the mantra 'for Yama ( strain ) the soma'
( Rg X 14 13 ) and with the words 'Yama, come here and stāy here,'
he should contemplate upon the dark Yama 'Tvam no Vāmadevo Varunas-
Tristubh' Having invoked Varuna to the west with the mantra ' O Agni,
remove from us', (Rg IV 1 4) and with the words 'come here, Varuna, and
stay here,' he should contemplate upon Varuna who is of the lustre of cry-
stal. Having invoked Kubera to the north with the Yajus formula ' to
the over-lord of kings' ( Tai Ā. I 31 127, Mysore ed ) and with the words
' Come here, Kubera, and stay here', he should contemplate upon Kubera of
the golden complexion ' Agnim Medhātithir - Agni Gāyatrī' Having
invoked Agni to the south-east with the mantra ' we choose Agni as (our)
messenger ' ( Rg I 12 1 ) and with the words ' Come here, Agni, stay
here' he should contemplate Agni of the golden colour 'Mo su no Ghoraḥ
Kaṇvo Nirṛtir-Gāyatrī' Having invoked ( Nirṛti ) with the mantra 'may
not kill us' ( Rg I 38 6 ) and with the words 'here &c ', he should contemplate
upon the dark ( Nirṛti) 'Tava Vāyovyas'vo Vāyu-Gāyatrī' (Having invoked)
as in the preceding cases (Vāyu) with the mantra 'O wind, your protection'
( Rg VIII 26 21 ) and ( with the words ) 'here' &c, he should contemplate
upon the smoke-coloured ( Vāyu ) 'Tam-īs'ānam Gautama Iś'āno Jagatī'.
Having invoked (Īś'āna) with the mantra 'we invoke that lord' ( Rg I 89 5 )
and with the words 'here &c ' he should contemplate upon the ruddy (Iś'āno).
To the south ( of the place where ) Indra was invoked 'jmayā atra vasavo
Maitrāvaruno Vasiṣ'tho Vasavas - Triṣtup' Having invoked the eight
Vasus with the mantra 'O Vasus, here on this earth' ( Rg VII 39 3 ) and
with the words 'come here, stay here', ( he should ) contemplate upon them.
¶Dhara, Dhruva ( this verse occurs above p 48) 'Tyān-nu Sāmmado Matsyo
dvādas'ādityā Gāyatrī' Having invoked between Indra and Iś'ānu, the twelve
Ādityas with the mantra 'indeed those kṣatriyas' ( Rg VIII 67 1 ) ( he
should contemplate on them ) Dhātā, Aryamā ( these two verses are trans-
lated above p 48 )
'Ā Rudrāsaḥ s'yāvās'va ekādas'a rudrā jagatī ' To the west of Agni having
invoked the Rudras with the mantra ' O Rudras, come' ( Rg V. 57 1 )
and with the words ' here ' ( he should contemplate &c ).

1. In each of the following cases, before the actual mantra [is cited, we have the
   pratīkas of the mantra ( the first words for recognising it ), its rṣi ( sage ), its devatā ( deity )
   and metre The translation therefore does not set out all these details in brackets hereafter.

• P. 64 ( text ). ¶ P. 65 ( text ).
  V. M. 8