सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
व्यवहारमयूख (नीलकण्ठ भट्ट - पश्चिमी भारत की हिन्दू न्याय-संहिता एवं व्यवहार कोष)

व्यवहारमयूख (नीलकण्ठ भट्ट - पश्चिमी भारत की हिन्दू न्याय-संहिता एवं व्यवहार कोष)

Vyavahara Mayukha of Nilakantha Bhatta

नीलकण्ठ भट्ट (सम्पादक: पी. वी. काणे) द्वारा

DevanagariSanskritpublished332 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 39, कुल 332 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 39

6 VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA [ S I 1 9-10
[ M p 4 l 32-p 5 l 18
by various callings and belonging to different castes. And śreṇis are the
opposite of pūgas. Kulāni (means) the assembly of castemen, relatives
and blood relations. Bṛhaspati (p 281 v 25) also says
For those who move about in the forest a court should be held in the
forest, for soldiers in the army and for merchants in the caravans.

  • Karaṇa (means) sabhā (court). Kātyāyana mentions the (proper) time
    for investigating judicial proceedings
    The king putting down his foes should decide the causes conformably to
    the rules laid down in the śāstras in the court and in the first half of the
    day. The three parts¹ of the day omitting the (first) eighth part of it are
    declared to be the best time for (investigating) judicial proceedings as laid
    down in the śāstra.
    The eighth part is half of the first watch (of the day), the three parts
    are those that are subsequent to it and precede mid-day. And Samvarta decl-
    ares the tithis (lunar days) that are to be omitted (for investigating judicial
    proceedings)
    The wise should not look into judicial proceedings on these tithis viz.
    the 14th day (of the two halves of the month) the new moon the full
    moon and the eighth.
    Bṛhaspati (p 280 v 23) says
    Having occupied that (court) in the first half of the day along with
    the old the councillors and dependants he (the king) should investigate
    (judicial proceedings) and should listen to (the expositions of) purāṇas
    dharmaśāstra and arthaśāstra.
    Tam (means) the sabhā (the court). Arthaśāstra² (means) the science
    of politics. Nārada (p 15 v 39) declares (a rule of preference) in case of
    conflict between dharmaśāstra and arthaśāstra
    Where there is a conflict between dharmaśāstra and arthaśāstra
    one should do what is laid down in the dharmaśāstra and discard the
    dictates of arthaśāstra.
    But in case of conflict between two texts of dharmaśāstra, Yājñavalkya
    (2. 21) says
    ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
    1 'The three parts &c.'—the idea is that the day (of 12 hours) is to be divided into eight
    parts (of 1½ hours each) and the court was to be held after the first part (of 1½ hours)
    and before midday (i.e. roughly between 7.30 A.M. and noon).
    2 Arthaśāstra—Mandlik and Bor. translate this as 'moral laws' but this is wrong. The
    well-known work of Kauṭilya on politics and state administration is styled arthaśāstra.
    P. 6 (text)