व्यवहारमयूख (नीलकण्ठ भट्ट - पश्चिमी भारत की हिन्दू न्याय-संहिता एवं व्यवहार कोष)

व्यवहारमयूख (नीलकण्ठ भट्ट - पश्चिमी भारत की हिन्दू न्याय-संहिता एवं व्यवहार कोष)
Vyavahara Mayukha of Nilakantha Bhatta
नीलकण्ठ भट्ट (सम्पादक: पी. वी. काणे) द्वारा
DevanagariSanskritpublished332 पृष्ठ
पृष्ठ 37, कुल 332 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंपृष्ठ 37
4 ] VYAVAHĀRAMAYŪKHA [ S I 1 6-3
[ M p 3 l 15-p. 4 l. 0
In this passage (the word) brāhmaṇa (means) one who is not
appointed (as a member of the court to decide causes) while sabhyas
(assessors) are those who are appointed (by the king to decide causes)
And to the same effect it has been said (Nārada p. 36 v 2)
One who knows dharma, whether appointed or not must speak out
(what the decision should be¹)
Bṛhaspati (278 v 12) declares the definition of (prāḍvivāka) a judge —
He who in a controversy asks questions and also cross-questions and
who is the first to speak (to a litigant) in a sweet manner is therefore
known as prāḍvivāka
- Vyāsa declares the definition of amātya (councillor)
The king should appoint as amātya a person of the regenerate classes who
knows all the śāstras who is not avaricious, who utters what is just who
is a brāhmaṇa who is wise and to whom the office comes hereditarily
In this passage the word dvija (a man of the regenerate classes) is used
again (even after the word vipra a brāhmaṇa) for the purpose of including
a kṣatriya or a vaiśya (for appointment as minister²) in the absence of a
brāhmaṇa To the same effect (18) Kātyāyana
Where there is no learned brāhmaṇa, (the king) should appoint a
kṣatriya or a vaiśya who is proficient in dharmaśāstra (but he) should
carefully exclude a śūdra
And Yājñavalkya (2-2) says as regards sabhyas (members of the court)
The king should appoint as members of the sabhā (court of justice)
those who are endowed with Vedic learning who are learned in dharma
(law) who speak the truth who do equal (justice) to friend and foe
As regards their number Bṛhaspati (p 278 v 11) says
That sabhā (court) where are seated seven five or even three brāhmaṇas
who are conversant with worldly affairs and who are learned in the Vedas
and in dharma (law) resembles (in holiness) a yajña (sacrifice)
The same author (p 279 v 14) says
The king should appoint as gaṇaka (accountant) and lekhaka (scribe)
two persons who are versed in the principles of grammar (śabda) and
lexicography (abhidhāna) who are proficient in reckoning (casting figures)
who are pure and who are acquainted with various alphabets
1 On the words 'appointed and sabhya vide notes to V M. pp. 10-11
2 Bṛhaspati, as quoted in the Vyavahāramātṛkā of Jīmūtavāhana says In a sacrifice
is honoured Viṣṇu while in vyavahāra the king (is honoured) there (in sacrifice) the
sacrificer is the successful (party) and the animal (sacrificed) is the vanquished party
(as in a litigation) the plaint and the reply are the clarified butter and the conclusion is
(havis) the offering the Śāstra (dharmaśāstra) is the Veda and the sabhyas are the sacrificial
priests who receive dakṣiṇā (payment for acting as adjudicators)
P 4 (text)