वृक्षायुर्वेद (सुरपाल - प्राचीन भारतीय पादप-विज्ञान, कृषि एवं वृक्ष-चिकित्सा सटीक)

वृक्षायुर्वेद (सुरपाल - प्राचीन भारतीय पादप-विज्ञान, कृषि एवं वृक्ष-चिकित्सा सटीक)
Vrikshayurveda of Surapala with Commentary
सुरपाल (अनुवादक: नलिनी साधले) द्वारा
DevanagariHindipublished101 पृष्ठ
पृष्ठ 70, कुल 101 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंपृष्ठ 70
- "Bahustambha vitapino" (Borkar's text). "Bahustamba
vitapino" (Majumdar's text). The latter makes better
sense when compared with "Aprakande stambagulmau"
(Amarakosa II.9). "Gulma" or "stamba" denote plants
which do not have one prominent stem. "Na vidyate
prakando yasya" and is often used in the sense of "bushes
or plants growing in a cluster" as defined in Amarakosa. - "Brhati"—Two varieties (big and small) are listed
in Bhavaprakasanighantu: Solanum indicum Linn. and
S. xanthocarpum Schrad & Wendl. - "Durakoorchitagram" is not clear.
- The second line is defective. Both Majumdar and
Borkar texts read as "Datvavasu vasumateem va gunavate"
which makes sense. - "Beejadham" means the place that holds the seed,
i.e., where the seed is kept. "Nrnaamstreenaam" is
defective and must be read as "Trnaasteernnam" (covered
with grass). "Nistrnam" means "removing the grass". - "Sthiram Lagnam" indicates certain zodiacal signs,
viz., Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, and Aquarius. When the Sun
is in association with them the condition is
astronomically called "Sthira Lagna" because any work
done under these signs is supposed to be lasting. - After growing sesame or black gram in a particular
land it is believed to be useless for growing any other
crop at least for a year or two. While purchasing new
farm lands, the farmer would investigate about the crops
produced on the land during the previous two years.
This practice is followed even today. - The reference to "gotikas" is noteworthy. Kikasa is
the breast bone and the cartilages of the rib connected
with it. In several verses (nos. 124, 151, 196, 216, 229,
- of Vrikshayurveda there is a reference to gomansa
(the flesh of the cow) and in yet others (verses 220, 252, - there is a reference to cow bones. The use of these
parts of a cow in agriculture indicates an implied
sanction to the killing of a cow which is sacrilegious
according to Hindu religion. No doubt, there are
references to killing of a cow or eating beef in the Vedic
literature. Cow's milk was used in the sacrificial rituals.
Considering this usefulness, the cow was regarded as
sacred and gradually ill-treating or killing a cow came
to be discouraged. Somewhere in the Puranic period, a
total ban on the killing of a cow and on beef eating was
effectively implemented and the Smritis (the ancient
Hindu code of law) accorded statutory sanction to the
same. It is evident from the above-stated references in
Vrikshayurveda, such a ban did not stop the use of flesh
and bones of a cow in agriculture.
In fact, ancient texts like Atharvaveda, Brhatsamhita,
Krsisangraha of Parasara and the Sukraniti contain clear
instructions on manuring including prescriptions of free
use of beef, etc.
- "Tridvihastaistadvat" is metrically defective.
Majumdar (1935) reads as "Dvichatustribhirantaritam".
The required correction here could be
"Trichaturdvihastaistadvat" to suit the meter. - Kunapa—This was a fertilizer consisting of flesh,
meat, and marrow of several animals. After cooking
these, various other substances like oil cake, honey, black
gram, ghee, etc. were added. The whole compound was
preserved and by mixing with water, liquid fertilizers
were prepared. The long and complicated process of
preparing and preserving kunapa is explained in detail
in verses 101–106.
64