वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

{SŪ. 4. 1. 14.
ADH. 8] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 797
destruction of a knower’s subsequent and prior sins, sprung up from
thoughtlessness, are indeed justifiable.
Here ends the section entitled “On the attainment of that” (7).
Adhikaraṇa 8: The section entitled “The
other”. (Sūtra 14)
SŪTRA 14
“OF THE OTHER TOO, (THERE IS) NON-CLINGING THUS, BUT ON THE
FALL.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
Since the good deeds also, aiming at selfish ends, are incompatible
with salvation, just as the sins are, there result the non-clinging of
the subsequent and the destruction of the prior (in their case too).
Immediately after the non-clinging and destruction of the subsequent
and prior (merits and sins), salvation arises at once “on the fall” of
the body.
Vedānta-kaustubha
In the immediately adjoining sūtra, it has been said that there
is the cessation of the knower’s evil deeds, sprung up from thought-
lessness. Now the author points out that there is the cessation of his
good deeds no less.
If it be suggested: subsequent and prior sins being harmful,
let there be the non-clinging and destruction, respectively, of subse-
quent and prior sins, through knowledge. But such non-clinging
and destruction of good deeds through knowledge are not justifiable,
since they being enjoined in Scripture are not incompatible with
knowledge,—the author extends the above reasoning here too thus:
“Of the other too”. That is, as in the case of sins, there must be non-
clinging and destruction, through knowledge, of what is other than
sins, i.e. of the good deeds too which aim at selfish ends. Why?
On account of the designation of that, i.e. just as the evil deeds are
designated as rejectible by one desirous of salvation, since they are
incompatible with salvation, so the good deeds, too, are likewise