वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

626 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA [SŪ. 3. 3. 26.
ADH. 11.]
the fact that a text, mentioned in one branch, may form the supple-
ment of a text, mentioned in another branch, thus: "As in the case of
the kuśa, metre, praise and accompanying song". Thus, just as it
being known in a general manner that the kuśas are the progeny of
tree from the text of the Kauṣītakins, viz. "You kuśas are the progeny
of the tree, do protect me", it is known from the specific text of the
Śāṭyāyanins: "The progeny of the udumbara tree", that the kuśas
are the progeny of the udumbara tree,—this being so, the text of the
Śāṭyāyanins becomes the supplement of the text of the Kauṣītakins,—
the construction of this (latter) text is as follows: O Kuśas! You are
the progeny of the tree, protect, i.e. save me, the sacrificer;—just as
no specific order of priority and posteriority of gods and demons being
mentioned in the text: "Let one praise by metres", a specific order is
known from the text of the Paiṅgins, viz. "The metres of the gods
are prior"; just as on an enquiry into the time of chanting, which is
a subsidiary part of the taking of a particular kind of pot, viz. ṣoḍaśin,
the time not being known specifically from the text: "He assists the
chanting of the ṣoḍaśin with gold", the text of the Taittirīyas, desig-
nating the time specifically thus: "When the sun is half risen, he assists
the chanting of the ṣoḍaśin" (Śat. Ś.S. 9.7.19) becomes the supplement
of that text; and just as the prohibitive text of one branch, viz.
"The Adhvaryyu does not join the singing" (Tait. Saṃ. 6.3.1)
becomes the supplement of the non-specific text of a different branch,
viz. "The sacrificial priests join the singing"—so in the matter under
discussion too, viz. abandoning, there is the insertion of taking.
(The author) shows that this view that general texts imply specific
texts is supported by another teacher as well, thus: "It has been
said", i.e. said by Jaimini, viz. "Let it be, on the contrary, supple-
mentary to the text, on account of the impropriety of an option.
Let the injunction refer to the same place" (Pū. Mī. Sū. 10.8.15).
The establishing of the double implication (viz. of abandoning
and taking) in places concerned, on the other hand, should be known
to be meant for the benefit of the respective readers of those
(treatises). Hence it is established that "in the abandonment",
taking is inserted.
Here ends the section entitled "Abandonment" (11).