वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 3. 2. 5.
ADH. 1.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 513
the Intelligent Being can be subject to pleasure and pain.¹ Hence
the dream-objects which are such cannot be due to the Lord, although,
of course, He being the controller of all, is the cause here too in that
sense.²
Baladeva
Baladeva begins a new topic here, ending with the next sūtra,
and concerned with establishing that the dream-objects are real.
Hence the sūtra. “And (a dream-object is real) for (it is) indicative
(of the future), those who are versed in it (also) declare (so)”.³
CORRECT CONCLUSION (continued)
SŪTRA 5
“BUT THROUGH THE WISH OF THE HIGHEST, (THE REAL ATTRIBUTES
OF THE SOUL REMAIN) HIDDEN, FOR FROM THAT ITS BONDAGE
AND (ITS REVERSE) (VIZ. RELEASE) (RESULT).”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If the soul be the maker of the dream-objects, then the attributes
of having true resolves and the rest must surely be admitted on its
part. But through the wish of the Supreme Lord in accordance
with the deeds of the soul, they remain “hidden” during its state of
bondage. From Him alone the soul’s bondage and release arise,
as declared by the scriptural text: “The cause of transmigration,
bondage, subsistence, salvation” (Śvet. 6.16 ⁴).
Vedānta-kaustubha
To the objection, viz. Why should the soul’s attributes of having
true resolves and the rest remain hidden during its state of bondage?—
the author replies:
1 “Na hi prajñā-jasya sukha-duhkha-yogyatayāvakalpate.” It is difficult
to see the point of this argument, and it is difficult to see how Bhāskara would
have answered Nimbārka’s objection to this view.
2 Bh B. 3.2.4, p 161
3 G.B 3.2.4, p. 43, Chap 3.
4 Correct quotation: “Saṁsāra-mokṣa-sthiti-bandha-hetuḥ” Vide Śvet.
6.16, p. 72.