वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

512 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA [SŪ. 3. 2. 4
ADH. 1.]
individual soul were the creator of dream-objects, then it would
have enjoyed happiness alone by creating women and the rest which
are indicative of good alone, but it would never have created a black
person and the rest for its own destruction.
And the followers of that branch too ¹ speak of the Supreme Soul
as the maker of objects of desires, thus. "He is awake in those that
are asleep, the Person, making desire after desire That alone is
the bright, that is Brahman, that alone is said to be the Immortal
In Him all the worlds rest, no one surpasses Him" (Katha 5.8), it
being impossible for the marks, stated in the scriptural text about
dream-creation and referring to the Supreme Lord, to refer to the
individual soul
COMPARISON
Śaṁkara
Interpretation different, viz. "Because a (dream though unreal)
(is yet) indicative (of the future), those who are versed in it also
declare (this)" That is, although the dream itself is unreal, yet the
thing indicated by it may be real. Further, the dream-objects are
created by the individual soul itself, and not by the Supreme Soul,
though it is not denied altogether that the Supreme Self is active in
dreams, since the Lord of all, the Supreme Soul, is the controller of
the soul at all times and in all its states ². This view is diametrically
opposed to Nimbārka's view, as evident.
Rāmānuja and Śrīkaṇṭha
They change the order of the sūtras 4–6 which will be noticed
at the end of sūtra 6 Interpretation same
Bhāskara
Interpretation different, viz. "And (the individual soul and not
the Lord is the creator of dream-objects,) (for) (a dream is) indicative
(of future good and evil), those who are versed in it (also) declare
(so)". That is, it is unreasonable to suppose that what is created by
¹ Viz. Katha., mentioned by the prima facie objector.
² Ś, B. 3.2.4, pp. 309-10.