सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 530, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 530

[sū. 3. 2. 3.
ADH. 1.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 509
created by the Lord, so are the dream-objects. Hence just as the
former are real, so must be the latter.¹
Baladeva
He does not regard this sūtra too as laying down a prima facie
view, but the correct conclusion. Hence it means: "Some (depict
the Lord alone) as the maker (of dream-objects), sons and the rest".²
CORRECT CONCLUSION (Sūtra 3-6)
SŪTRA 3
"BUT (THE DREAM-CREATION IS) MERE MĀYĀ, (THE INDIVIDUAL
SOUL IS NOT THE CREATOR OF DREAM OBJECTS) ON ACCOUNT OF
NOT HAVING (ITS OWN ATTRIBUTES) FULLY MANIFEST IN NATURE."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
With regard to it, we reply: In the state of dream, the group
of effects like chariots and the rest is made by the supreme Lord alone,
possessed of true resolves and omniscient,—since such wonderful
objects are not indeed made by the individual soul, its attributes of
having true resolves and the rest being not "fully ³ manifest" during
its state of bondage.
Vedānta-kaustubha
With regard to this, the author states the correct conclusion.
The word "but" is meant for disposing of the above view. The
dream-chariots and the like are "mere māyā", i.e. simply wonderful.
Here the word "māyā" means wonderful things. Lord Vāsudeva, an
adept in the art of creating and destroying all wonderful objects,
creates—through His own powers which are inconceivable—groups of
wonderful objects like chariots and the rest, in accordance with the
respective deeds of souls in order that they may enjoy these objects.
But it is not possible for the dreaming soul itself to be their creator
in the absence of appropriate implements and the like,—because its
¹ Ś.B 3 2 2, pp. 706-7; Bh. B. 3.2.2, p. 161.
² G.B. 3.2.2, pp. 41-42, Chap. 3.
³ The C.S.S. ed. (p. 51) reads "sākalyena" instead of "kārtsnyena"