वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)
Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary
भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 529, कुल 906 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें508 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [SŪ. 3. 2. 2.
ADH. 1.]
PRIMA FACIE VIEW (concluded)
SŪTRA 2
“AND SOME (DESIGNATE) THE MAKER, AND SONS OF THE REST.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
In the passage: “He who is awake in those that are asleep, the
person making desire after desire” (Katha 5.8 ¹) “some” speak of
a creator of the desires of the soul,² viz. sons and so on, in the state of
dream.
Vedānta-kaustubha
Moreover, in the text: “He who is awake in those that are asleep,
the person making desire after desire” (Katha 5.8), the followers
of “some” branches speak of the individual soul as a creator, making
objects of desire in the state of dream. The author states the objects
of desire, referred to in the text, thus “sons and the rest”. By the
word ‘desire’, objects that are desired, viz. sons of the rest, are denoted,
and not a mere wish, in accordance with the introductory texts:
‘ “Ask for all objects of desire (kāma) just as you wish” ’ (Katha. 1.25),
‘ “Choose sons and grandsons living a hundred years” ’ (Katha. 1.23).
The statement of Prajāpati ³ clearly establishes that the individual
soul has true resolves and so on. Hence it is possible for the soul,
endowed as it is with (the attributes) of true resolves and so on, to
be the creator of chariots, etc.—this is the prima facie view.
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara and Bhāskara
Interpretation different. They too take this sūtra as laying
down the prima facie view, but as pointed out above, the problem
is a different one for them. Thus: “Some (depict the Lord as) the
maker (of dream-objects); and sons and the rest”. That is, just as,
the prima facie objector continues, the objects in the waking state are
¹ Ś, R, Bh, ŚK, B.
² Other editions, viz. the C.S.S. ed (p. 51) and the Brindaban ed (1905)
(p. 326) read: “jīvaṃ kāmānām”, in which case the meaning would be, “some
speak of the soul as the creator of desires”. This reading seems preferable.
V.K. also follows it.
³ Vide Chānd. 8.7.1.