सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 405, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 405

[sū. 2. 2. 44.
ADH. 8.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 385
Vedānta-kaustubha
The term "or" has the meaning 'but'. Śakti is the abode of a
mass of natural attributes like knowledge, strength and the rest,
independent by nature of anything else, and self-relying "If there
be the existence," i.e. admission, "of knowledge and so on", in this
manner, on the other hand, then "there is no denial of that", i.e. its
causality is not denied. In this aphorism: "And endowed with all
(attributes)" (Br. Sū. 2.1 29), there is designated a Deity, knowable
through all the Vedāntas, and it is He that is admitted by you. He is
not the power (Śakti) of any one, He is the Highest Deity, denoted by
the word 'Brahman' and so on. The sense is that the doctrine of
Śakti defeats itself.
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara and Bhāskara
The criticism of the Pañca-rātra doctrine continued: viz "(Even)
if there be the existence of knowledge, there is no setting aside of that
(viz. of the above objection)". That is, even if be said that Saṃkarṣaṇa
and the rest are not the individual soul and so on, but divine beings,
endowed with supreme knowledge and the rest, still then the objection
stated before, viz the impossibility of origination, remains in force.¹
Rāmānuja
This is sūtra 41 in his commentary. According to him this 'sūtra
and the next set forth the correct conclusion against the above prima
facie view, and defend the Pañca-rātra doctrine. Thus, it means:
"If (Saṃkarṣaṇa and the rest be) of the nature of knowledge and so
on (i.e. of the Highest Lord), there is no contradiction of that". That
is, the Pañca-rātra doctrine is not that individual soul arises from the
Lord, the mind from the individual soul, and so on, but simply that the
Highest Lord, viz. Vāsudeva, out of kindness for people, abides in a
four-fold form, so that He may be easily accessible to His devotees.²
Śrīkaṇṭha
This is sūtra 41 in his commentary as well He takes it to be a
prima facie view, viz. "If there be the assumption of intelligence and
1 Ś.B. 2.2.41, pp. 574 ff.; Bh. B. 2.2.40 (written 2 2.44), p. 129.
2 Śrī. B. 2.2.41, pp. 116-117, Part 2.
25