उत्तररामचरितम् (महाकवि भवभूति - संस्कृत मूल एवं हिन्दी व्याख्या)

—IV 21] UTTARARÂMACHARITA. 137
She supposed that सीता was dead and that it was not possible
that her child could be living किमपी विलपति prattles out
something strange with reference to this (boy) Verse 22
We must take आकृति and द्युति as the subjects of संबिभज्येते
Otherwise we shall have to look upon प्रतिबिम्बा as the subject,
which does not seem proper But this construction breaks
the symmetry We see that all the clauses having सा or सा
are separate So it would be better if we could stop at निखिलं
As the text stands, we have to take सम्पूर्ण येन as qualifying
आकृति वत्साया सैवाकृति that whole frame of my child
(Sita) and of the best of Raghus (i e Râma) is seen in
this boy as if it were fully reflected. If we read सम्पूर्ण चैव,
then प्रतिबिम्बा may be taken as a noun by itself. The meaning
then would be 'the complete reflection of my child and of the
best of Raghus is assuredly manifested in this boy' N reads
संसृष्टि प्रति०, which is easily construable We can in this case
stop at निखिलं and take सैवाकृति as a separate sentence But the
word संसृष्टि cannot be well explained. वीर० explains संसृष्टि
मन्दस्ते । सम्बन्धे इत्यर्थः The meaning then would be 'the whole of
the features of सीता and राम is seen manifested in this boy'
संसृष्टि literally means 'becoming' सा द्युति the same (as that of
राम and सीता) is (his) brilliance (of complexion) सहज natural
(not studied). पुण्यानुभव holy majesty पुण्यश्लोको अनुभावः
'अनुभावः प्रभावे च सत्ता च मतिनिश्चये' इत्यमर For देव N reads देवि,
which must be taken as addressed to सीता वीर० explains 'देवी
तानेन देवभूता गतायास्त्व चयन्निदं मरण्डते इति मन्यन्ते' उत्पथे भ्रमति my
mind being unsteady runs by wrong paths (i e wild) अतवे —
On account of the great resemblance between सीता and the
boy, जनक was led to think that he might be her son. But he
supposed her to have passed away when abandoned So he
thought it impossible that her son should be existing 'चपल
तरलं चौर पारिप्लवपरीग्रहे' इत्यमर. मति-कौसल्या wants to find out
whether her surmise has any basis कथयितव्य कथय tell us what
is fit to be told. She means-you are only his pupil, how
can you be his son? ब्राम्ह्यं led a life of celibacy
P 101 एतावदेव-this much only चन्द्रकेतु--son of लक्ष्मण
and ऊर्मिला We were informed in the second Act (p 39
-text) that चन्द्रकेतु was sent at the head of the army protecting
the horse let loose in the अश्वमेध sacrifice न केन प्रवेष्टव्या no one
should trespass upon the precincts of the hermitage अम्वर्तं