सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
द इण्डियन स्ट्रगल / भारतीय स्वाधीनता संग्राम (नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस - ऐतिहासिक विश्लेषण)

द इण्डियन स्ट्रगल / भारतीय स्वाधीनता संग्राम (नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस - ऐतिहासिक विश्लेषण)

The Indian Struggle 1920-1934 by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose

नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished339 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 195, कुल 339 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 195

SIGNS OF COMING UPHEAVAL 197
appreciating the sincerity underlying the Viceroy's pro-
nouncement and tendering co-operation to His Majesty's
Government in their effort to evolve a Dominion Constitution
'for India. The signatories further hoped that the Round
Table Conference proposed 'not to discuss when Dominion
Status is to be established but to frame a scheme of Dominion
Constitution for India.' They also urged that the Round
Table Conference should be preceded by a general amnesty.
The manifesto was signed by Mahatma Gandhi, Messrs.
Nehru (father and son), Pandit M. M. Malaviya, Dr. Ansari,
Dr. Moonje, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the Right Hon. V. S.
Sastri, Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru, Mrs. Besant, Mrs. Naidu and
others. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru did not at first agree with
the other leaders and intended issuing a contrary manifesto
together with the writer. But towards the end of the meeting,
Mahatma Gandhi prevailed upon him to sign the leaders'
manifesto on the ground that he was the President-elect of
the Lahore Congress, and the manifesto would lose much of
its value if his signature did not appear on it. Thereafter
Dr. S. Kitchlew (Lahore), Mr. Abdul Bari (Patna) and the
writer issued a separate manifesto opposing the acceptance
of Dominion Status and also the idea of participating in the
so-called Round Table Conference. The manifesto pointed
out that in a real Round Table Conference only the belligerent
parties should be represented and the Indian representatives
should be selected not by the British Government as had
been intended, but by the Indian people. It also warned the
Indian people that the Viceroy's pronouncement was a trap
laid by the British Government. It was reminiscent of a
similar move made by the British Government some years
ago in the case of Ireland when the Prime Minister, Mr.
Lloyd George, suggested that an Irish Convention consist-
ing of all parties should be held for framing a Constitution
for Ireland—but the Sinn Fein Party were clever enough to.
see through the game and boycott the convention. The
leaders' manifesto drew public attention and a large measure
of public support as well. The contrary manifesto, however,
was welcomed only by Left-Wing Congressmen and by the
youth in general.