सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
द इण्डियन स्ट्रगल / भारतीय स्वाधीनता संग्राम (नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस - ऐतिहासिक विश्लेषण)

द इण्डियन स्ट्रगल / भारतीय स्वाधीनता संग्राम (नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस - ऐतिहासिक विश्लेषण)

The Indian Struggle 1920-1934 by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose

नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished339 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 177, कुल 339 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 177

THE BAROMETER RISES 179
Congress week had unfortunate consequences. All those
who did not have a hand in drafting the Nehru Report now
made a dead set against it. Mr. M. A. Jinnah, who a year
earlier had advocated a progressive nationalist point of view
at the Moslem League Conference in Calcutta, now came
forward with his famous 'fourteen points' in order to amend
the communal settlement embodied in the Nehru Report.
He demanded, among other things, one-third of the elected
seats in both Houses of the Indian Legislature for Moslems,
reservation of seats for Moslems in Bengal and Punjab on a
population basis, vesting of residuary powers in the provinces,
etc. This attitude served to make Mr. Jinnah popular with
his reactionary co-religionists but undermined the value and
importance of the Nehru Report. Following the Moslems,
the Sikhs also made extreme demands, while the represen-
tatives of the Hindu Mahasabha refused to make any further
concessions beyond what had been already embodied in the
Nehru Report and they even criticised adversely the conces-
sions made by the Nehru Committee to the Moslem demands.
It was difficult to get the support of the Moslem League
for the Nehru Report, because of the parties within that
body, based largely on personal considerations. For instance,
the group led by the late Sir Mohammed Shafi took up a
non possumus attitude on the communal question and on
the political question, advocated co-operation with the Simon
Commission. The Nationalist bloc stood for whole-hearted
acceptance of the Nehru Report and for complete boycott
of the Simon Commission. The group led by Mr. Jinnah
had a reactionary attitude on the communal question but
advocated the boycott of the Simon Commission. A meeting
of the Moslem League was summoned at Delhi in March
1929, to consider the question and there was a clash between
the warring sections, so that the meeting ended in pande-
monium.
In December 1927, when the Madras Congress decided in
favour of convening an All-Parties Conference, it appeared
as if the decision was a right one. This feeling was confirmed
when the Nehru Committee was able to produce a unanimous
report and the All-Parties Conference at Lucknow in August