ताण्ड्य महाब्राह्मण / पञ्चविंश ब्राह्मण (सायण भाष्य एवं चिन्नस्वामी शास्त्री टीका सहित)

: क्र has the diagonal slash from top-right to bottom-left across the vertical stem.
In अतिका-: does it have the diagonal slash?
Look at का in line 14: क्रामति has it.
At the end of line 17: अ ति का? Wait, look at क: no diagonal slash! It looks like अतिका-!
Wait, but why अतिकान्तो? Could it be a printing typo for अतिक्रान्तो?
Yes, in old Indian letterpress printing, typesetters sometimes missed the 'ra' ligature or it broke off.
Wait, let me look really closely at the end of line 17:
अ ति then क with ा:
Wait, is there a tiny faint diagonal? No, it looks purely like का.
Wait, let me look again. Under the left curve of क, there is nothing. Under the right, nothing.
So it is printed as अतिका- / न्तो ভবति.
Wait, let's keep what's printed: अतिका- (or अतिक्रा-? Usually best to print what is visible, or अतिक्रा-? Wait, let's look at क्र in अतिक्रामति just 2 words before: अतिक्रामति has a very prominent diagonal slash across the left