तैत्तिरीय आरण्यक (सायण भाष्य एवं भट्टभास्कर भाष्य सहित सम्पूर्ण प्रथम भाग)

? No, it looks like ष्टा!
Wait, look at the two characters:
First character: द्वे
Second character: ष्टा?
Wait, is the second character ष्टा?
Let's compare ष्टा in L17:
In L17: द्वेष्टा: द्वे then ष्टा. The ष्टा in L17 has a loop for ष, subscript ट, and an ा matra with a horizontal connector.
In L25: after द्वे, the character has:
Wait, it has an ा matra!
Yes, it has a vertical line on the right!
And the body has ष + ट?
Wait, or is it द्वौ?
Wait, if it were द्वौ: द् + वौ. But here we have द्वे first!
Wait, is the first one द्वे?
Yes, द् with व and top slant stroke े: that is unmistakably द्वे.
Then the next akshara:
Wait, is it ष्टा?
Yes, it looks like ष्टा! But wait, why is it द्वेष्टा?
In Sanskrit, द्वेष्टा द्वेष्यश्च इति उभयविधं is a dvandva compound or mentioning the two words:
"द्वेष्यं द्वेष्टा चेत्युभयविधं शत्रुं" -