श्रीभाष्य (भगवद् रामानुजाचार्य - विशिष्टाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य सटीक)

(nta with i-matra attached or separate). If the compositor grabbed 'न्ति' instead of 'न्त', it would print 'न्तिर'.
Yes, that happens very frequently in old Hindi/Sanskrit presses!
Let's print "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं" or "जीवादर्थान्तिरभूतं"?
Wait, let's look at standard transcription prompt: "pure, clean Markdown in Unicode Devanagari... Do NOT output LaTeX math syntax."
If we write "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं", a reader reading the Sanskrit will see the correct word, but if they are comparing character by character against the image, they might notice.
Wait, let's look really closely at L14:
Is it possible that it IS "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं"?
Look at the bar:
Wait, look at "प्रज्ञात्मा आनंदोऽजरोऽमृतः" in L15.
Look at L14: 'जी', 'वा', 'द', 'र्था', 'न्', 'त', 'र', 'भू', 'तं'.
Wait, is there really an 'ि'?
Look at the curve above 'र्था':
Wait! The repha is on 'र्थ'. But there is an 'ा' matra.
Wait, in Devanagari, when a letter has repha and 'ा' matra, the repha is placed on the 'ा' matra! Like 'र्था'.
Now look at what is after 'र्था':
There