सिद्धान्तशिखामणि (शिवयोगी रेणुकाचार्य - वीरशैव षट्स्थल दर्शन एवं शक्तिविशिष्टाद्वैत महाग्रन्थ)

': it has a vertical bar for 'क', the loop on left, the cross on right going down into 'त', and then 'त' has a vertical stem!
That vertical stem of 'त' is just part of 'क्त'! It is NOT 'ा'!
A normal 'क्त' in Devanagari has a vertical stem on the right (from 'त')!
So:
रु (ru) + द्र (dra) + भु (bhu) + क्त (kta) + न्नं (nnaṁ) = रुद्रभुक्तन्नं? Or रुद्रभुक्तं + ... wait, why does the Latin say:
rudrabhuktānnam?
Wait! In the Latin:
r u d r a b h u k t ā n n a m
There is an ā with a macron!
Why does the Latin have ā?
Because the editor transcribed 'क्ता' with an aa-kara!
So in Devanagari it is:
रुद्रभुक्तारन्नं ? No, if Latin has rudrabhuktānnam, it's:
रुद्रभुक्त (or भुक्ता) + न्नं!
Wait, where did I see 'र'? There is NO 'र'! It was just misinterpreting the first 'न' of 'न्नं'!
Yes! It is रुद्रभुक्तारन्नं? No, it's रुद्रभुक्तारन्नं is not even possible, it is `रु