काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

278 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA
समाप्तपुनरात्तं क्वचिन्न गुणो न दोषः । यत्र न विशेषण-
मात्रदानार्थं पुनर्ग्रह्णम् अपि तु वाक्यान्तरमेव क्रियते । यथा
अत्रैव प्रागप्राप्त इत्यादौ ॥३१८॥
अपदस्थसमासं क्वचिद् गुणः । यथा उदाहृते रक्ताशोक-
इत्यादौ ॥३१९॥
गर्भितं तथैव । यथा—
हुमि अवहत्थिअरेहो णिरंकुसो अह विवेअरहिओ वि ।
सिविणे वि तुमम्मि पुणो पत्तिहि भत्तिं ण पसुमरामि ॥३२०॥
अत्र प्रतीहीति मध्ये दृढप्रत्ययोत्पादनाय । एवमन्यदपि लक्ष्याल्ल-
क्ष्यम् ॥५९॥
‘Resumption of the Concluded’ is neither a defect nor
an excellence in cases where the resumption is not for the
purpose of adding a further epithet, but is introduced as
a distinct statement; an example of this also we have in the
verse just referred to (‘Prāgaprāpta-etc. stanza No. 209).
‘Misplaced Compound’ is an excellence in certain
cases; e. g., in the verse ‘Raktāshoka &c’. (See above,
stanza No. 300).
[Where, though the long compound is not quite appropriate in the
delineation of the erotic passion, yet, as serving to intensify the
displeasure felt by the suffering lover, it helps to heighten the
said passion and becomes, as such, an excellence.]
Similarly the ‘Parenthetical’ also is an excellence in
some cases; e. g., in the following :
‘Humi avahatthiareho
Ṇiramkuso aha vivearahio vi
Siviṇevi tumammi puṇo.
Pattihi bhattiṁ ṇa pasumarāmi’.
‘Though devoid of the steady decorum of behaviour,
unrestrained and indiscreet, I do not even dream, believe me,
of disobeying you’. 59.