काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER VII 235
अत्र प्रत्ययस्य । 'सुखमीहितुं वा' इति युक्तः पाठः ।
ते हिमालयमामन्त्र्य पुनः प्रेक्ष्य च शूलिनम् ।
सिद्धं चास्मै निवेद्यार्थं तद्विसृष्टाः खमुद्ययुः ॥ २४६ ॥
अत्र सर्वनाम्नः । 'अनेन विसृष्टाः' इति तु वाच्यम् ।
महीभृतः पुत्रवतोपि दृष्टिस्तस्मिन्नपत्ये न जगाम तृप्तिम् ।
अनन्तपुष्पस्य मधोर्हि चूते द्विरेफमाला सविशेषसङ्गा ॥२४७॥
Here the uniformity of the affix (Infinitive) is broken.
The right reading would be ‘sukhamīhitum vā’.
In the following we have an example of the ‘Violation
of the Uniformity’ of the Pronoun—
‘Te himālayamāmantrya punaḥ prekṣya cha shūlinam
Siddhaṁchāsmai nivedyārthaṁ tadvisṛṣṭāḥ khamudyayuḥ’
‘Having asked Himālaya and seen Shiva, communica-
ted to him the fulfilment of the purpose, and, having ob-
tained his leave, repaired to the skies’.
Here the uniformity of the pronoun is broken ; the
right form would have been ‘anena visṛṣṭāḥ’ (in place of
‘tadvisṛṣṭāḥ’, which latter points to some one different
from the person, Shiva, just mentioned).
In the following we have an example of the ‘Violation
of the Uniformity’ of the synonym—
‘Mahībhṛtaḥ putravatopi dṛṣṭis—
Tasminnapatye na jagāma tṛptim
Anantapuṣpasya madhorhi chūte
Dvirephamālā savisheṣāsaṅgā’.
‘Though he had sons, yet his eyes were never tired
of feasting upon that child ; though spring is full of endless
flowers, yet the line of black bees has a special attachment
for the mango.’