काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

200 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA
अत्रार्यस्येति तातस्येति च वाच्यम् । न त्वनयोः समासे
गुणीभावः कार्यः । एवं समासान्तरेष्वप्युदाहार्यम् ।।
विरुद्धमतिकृद्यथा
श्रितक्षमा रक्तभुवः शिवालिङ्गितमूर्तयः ।
विग्रहक्षपणेनाद्य शेरते ते गतासुखाः ।।१९६।।
अत्र क्षमादिगुणयुक्ताः सुखमासते इति विवक्षिते हता इति
विरुद्धा प्रतीतिः ।।
Rāma, that Bharata is the younger brother ;’ and ‘it is of
my father that Kaikeyī is the wife,’ and ‘it is not possible
for a brother of Rāma or for the wife of my father to do
anything wrong’], [and hence these two being the pre-
dicative factors] the proper expressions should have been
‘āryasyānujosau’ ‘tātasya kalatram’; and it was not right
to make both these the subordinate factors of compounds.
Similar examples may be cited of this defect occurring
in other compounds.
(13) The following is an example of ‘repugnant im-
plication.’—
‘Shritakṣamā raktabhuvaḥ
‘Shivāliṅgitamūrtayaḥ
‘Vigrahakṣapaṇenādya
‘Sherate te gatāsukhāḥ’
‘They, having recourse to forgiveness, with the world
attached to them, and their bodies embraced by all that
is good, lie down, with all their troubles gone through the
removal of all quarrels.’
Here the meaning intended is that ‘persons of forgiving
nature remain happy’ (as translated above), but the words
chosen have another signification, which is entirely repug-
nant to this [‘Lying down on the ground (shṛtakṣamāḥ),