काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

194 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA
उत्कम्पिनी भयपरिस्खलितांशुकान्ता
ते लोचने प्रतिदिशं विधुरे क्षिपन्ती ।
क्रूरेण दारुणतया सहसैव दग्धा
धूमान्धितेन दहनेन न वीक्षितासि ॥१८७॥
यच्छब्दस्तूत्तरवाक्यानुगतत्वेनोपात्तः सामर्थ्यात्पूर्ववाक्यानु-
गतस्य तच्छब्दस्योपादानं नापेक्षते । यथा
साधु चन्द्रमसि पुष्करैः कृतं मीलितं यदभिरामताधिके ।
उद्यता जयिनि कामिनीमुखे तेन साहसममुष्ठितं पुनः ॥१८८॥
प्रागुपात्तस्तु यच्छब्दस्तच्छब्दोपादानं विना साकाङ्क्षः ।
(c) ‘Utkampinī……te lochane……..vīkṣitāsi’ ;—‘Tremb-
ling and having the clothing gliding off through fear,
and casting those timid glances all round, thou wert burnt
by the cruel fire blinded by smoke, and wert no longer
seen’ ;—[Here the pronoun ‘te’, ‘those’, standing for the
glances that the speaker has seen before, does not stand
in need of the corresponding ‘ye’].
The pronoun ‘yat’, (who or which) also, when occurring
in the latter of two correlated clauses, does not require
the corresponding ‘tat’ in the preceding clause, because
by reason of its inherent power (it always implies a pre-
ceding ‘tat’) ; as we find in the following example—
‘Sādhu…yadabhirāmatādhike…punaḥ ;’—‘On the rising of
the lovelier moon the lotuses did well that they closed
themselves ; but this moon has behaved most arrogantly
when he has risen even on the appearance of the face of the
lovely woman, which is far superior to her’. [Here ‘yat
mīlitam’ implies the corresponding ‘tat sādhu kṛtam’, and
hence the actual presence of this latter pronoun is not
necessary in the preceding clause].
But in cases when the pronoun ‘yat’ occurs in the