काशिका वृत्ति (आचार्य वामन एवं जयादित्य - अष्टाध्यायी सूत्र-वृत्ति सम्पूर्ण सान्वय सटीक)

, accuracy to the visible text is paramount. Let's look at line 17: "गुणास्य ।" - clearly printed "गुणास्य", even though it means "गुणस्य".
Line 16: "वादी नाम् ।" - clearly printed with a space, even though it means "ववादीनाम्".
Line 15: "योकारस्तस्य" - printed without avagraha.
So the print has typographical peculiarities.
Wait, let's look at L20 again:
Wait! Could that glyph be 'न्नि'?
Look at how 'न्नि' in "अर्वन्नित्येतस्याङ्गस्य" would be written if it was 'न्नि':
If a font doesn't have 'न्नि', some fonts used 'चि'? No, that's impossible.
Wait, is "अर्वचित्येतस्याङ्गस्य" intentional?
Wait! "अर्वच्" ???
Is "अर्वन्" ever called "अर्वच्"? No!
Wait, what if the root/word in the editor's mind was "अर्वत्"?
No, "अर्वणस्त्रसावनञः" - the stem is "अर्वन्".
Wait, why did the printer print "अर्वचित्येतस्याङ्गस्य"?
Wait! Look at the character 'चि':
Could it be 'त्' + 'इ' = 'ति'? No, 'ति' doesn't look like that.
Wait, look at line 20: "अर्वचित