ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (ब्रह्मगुप्त - शून्य, कुट्टक, बीजगणित एवं सम्पूर्ण २१ अध्याय सान्वय सटीक)

दी हुई है ।Then under ५७:(च) ४. कृत्वा for (कृत्वा)... Wait, why does it have ४.? Because in line 4 of the shloka, the superscript ४is overकृत्वा! Ah!! Look at the shloka: Line 3 of shloka (which is line 4 of the page): अन्येष्टनाडिकाभिः कृत्वा^४ तुल्या यदा तदा योगः ।The superscript४is overकृत्वा! And in note (क) at the bottom: ४. योगः for (योगे)-> superscript४? No, note (क) has 1, 2, 3, 4! Wait, in note (च): ४. कृत्वा for (कृत्वा)-> wait, why would (च) have४. कृत्वा for (कृत्वा)? Wait, look at the superscript over कृत्वा: it is ४! Why is ४overकृत्वाif note (च) says४. कृत्वा for (कृत्वा)? Wait, is the first word कृत्वा? Look at the first letter: कwithृ? Wait, look at line 28 carefully: (च) ४. कृत्वा for (कृत्वा)- wait, is theत्` different?
Look at the first one