विक्रम चरित (उज्जैन सम्राट् विक्रमादित्य - पराक्रम, न्याय एवं ३२ पुतलियों की कथा सटीक)
Vikram Charita or Adventures of Vikramaditya King of Ujjain
कवि हरिदास / परम्परा द्वारा
पृष्ठ 286, कुल 308 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें274
upon it the united abilities of his councillors, but all to no
purpose. At last he informed them, with the utmost
concern, that he could not at all explain to them their father's
meaning, and advised them to seek elsewhere for the expla-
nation they sought. The brothers had entertained great
hopes that King Vickramadetea, whose fame for wisdom
and capacity was spread throughout the land, would have
set before them a clear exposition of their case, but they
were now compelled to go elsewhere, with, as they feared,
far less chance of success. Being, however, very desirous
to obtain an explanation, they left Oojein, and travelled to
another court, where they met with no better success.
They next visited the city of Prathestan, and represented
their case to King Somekaunt, who patiently heard their
representations, but with no less amazement than their other
hearers. He also exerted his utmost talent and judgment,
combined with that of his councillors, to arrive at a decision,
but they also signally failed. Meanwhile, one of the coun-
cillors desired the brothers to attend on the morrow, when
they would be informed of the result of their application.
A certain potter, who lived in the same neighbourhood
with Shalivahan, was in the daily practice of going into the
town to sell his wares, after which he usually amused him-
self by going into court to hear the cases tried before the
king. He happened to be present on this occasion, and
heard the case of the three brothers. When he returned
home he communicated the matter to Shalivahan, and added
that the king had not been able to come to a decision, but
was much perplexed. Shalivahan laughed heartily when
he heard it, and said to the potter, "My good neighbour,
I am surprised, not so much at the case as at the want of
perception on the part of the king and his officials. It is
not a case of such great difficulty as to cause the king to
be at a loss to decide it. But perhaps you are only jesting
with me: has not the king been always famed for his
learning, and deservedly too? Does he not retain in his
court the ablest of councillors? All this is against what