वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

878 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [SŪ. 4. 4. 18.
ADH. 6.]
SŪTRA 18
“IF IT BE OBJECTED THAT ON ACCOUNT OF DIRECT TEACHING, NO,
(WE REPLY:) NO, ON ACCOUNT OF THAT WHICH ABIDES WITHIN
THE SPHERE OF THOSE ENTRUSTED WITH SPECIAL OFFICES BEING
MENTIONED.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If it be objected: Since by the scriptural text: “He becomes a
self-ruler. He comes to have freedom of movement in all the worlds”
(Chānd. 7.25.2 ¹) the freed soul is proved to have the activities in
connection with the universe, the stated view: “Exclusive of the
activities in connection with the universe” (Br. Sū. 4.4.17) is not
tenable,—
We reply: “no”, since that text simply declares that the objects
of enjoyments inhering in the worlds of Hiraṇyagarbha and the rest
are the objects of the freed soul’s enjoyment.
Vedānta-kaustubha
If it be objected: The view, stated above, that the lordship of the
freed soul is exclusive of the activities in connection with the universe,
is not tenable. Why? “On account of the direct teaching”: “He
becomes a self-ruler. He comes to have freedom of movement in all
the worlds” (Chānd. 7.25.2). The word ‘direct’ means ‘Scriptural’.
By Scripture, i.e. by the Chāndogya and the rest, the lordship of the
freed soul is taught as consisting in the activities in connection with
the universe,—on account of that,—
We reply: “no”. Why? “On account of that which abides
within the spheres of those who are entrusted with special offices
being mentioned,” i.e. because “that which abides within the spheres
of those who are entrusted with special offices”, or the objects of
enjoyment inhering in the worlds of Hiraṇyagarbha and so on too
“are mentioned”, i.e. established, by the Chāndogya-text, to be the
objects of the freed soul’s enjoyment.
1 R.