वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 1. 1. 21
ADH. 7 ] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA 67
garbha’s) connection with that (viz. the Supreme Lord) ’.¹ While
according to Nimbārka, sūtras 13–20 form one section, concerned with
the question of the ‘ānanda-maya’, according to Śrīkaṇṭha, Sūtras
13–16 form one section, while sūtras 17–20 form another different
section, concerned with the question, as noted above, whether Hiraṇya-
garbha is the creator of the world, or the Supreme Lord (viz. Śiva).
Baladeva
This is sūtra 19 in his commentary. Reading same, interpretation
of the word ‘tad-yogam’ different, viz. ‘union with fearlessness’.
Quotes the passage quoted by Śrīnivāsa.²
Adhikaraṇa 7: The section entitled ‘That which
is within’. (Sūtras 21-22)
SŪTRA 21
“THAT WHICH IS WITHIN (THE SUN AND THE EYE) (IS NONE BUT
THE HIGHEST SELF), ON ACCOUNT OF THE TEACHING OF HIS
QUALITIES.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
He who abides “within” the sun and the eye and is to be wor-
shipped by one desiring salvation, is, truly, the Highest Self alone,
and not a particular individual soul. Why? “On account of the
teaching of the qualities belonging to Him” alone, viz. qualities like
‘freedom from sins’, ‘being the soul of all’ and so on.
Vedānta-kaustubha
In this manner, it has been shown in a general manner in the
two sections that the stated texts all refer to Brahman, who is
different from pradhāna as well as from the individual soul and
is the cause of the origin and the rest of the world. Now, after
having mentioned the peculiar qualities of the Lord, such as, possess-
ing an eternally present, non-celestial body and so on, and then by
showing the concordance of those texts (with regard to the Lord),
the author denotes, up to the end of the section, the difference
¹ SK B. 1.1.20, pp 240-241, Part 3
² G.B 1.1.19, pp. 76–77, Chap. 1.