वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 1. 1. 19.
62 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA ADH. 6 ]
intermixture of qualities will result,—this is the meaning of the two
aphorisms.
COMPARISON
Śaṁkara
This is sūtra 17 in his commentary. Reading and literal inter-
pretation same, quotes the same passage, but in conclusion adds his
own view, viz. that really and transcendentally, there is no difference
between the soul, the obtainer, and Brahman, the obtained.¹
Rāmānuja
Reading and interpretation same, but refers to a different passage,
viz. Taittirīya-upaniṣad, 2.5.²
Śrīkaṇṭha
Reading same, interpretation different, viz : ‘(If it be said that
Hiraṇyagarbha is identical with the Supreme Lord, then we reply,
no), on account of the designation of difference’.³
——
SŪTRA 19
“AND ON ACCOUNT OF DESIRE (THROUGH WHICH SIMPLY THE
LORD IS ABLE TO REALIZE HIS PURPOSES), THERE IS NO DEPEN-
DENCE (OF THE LORD) ON (WHAT IS AN OBJECT OF) INFERENCE
(VIZ. PRADHĀNA).”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If the individual soul be admitted to be the cause, it must depend
on a material cause, viz. on pradhāna which is an (object of) “in-
ference”, just as a potter has to depend on clay and the rest in creating
pots and the like. But the Highest Person, non-material, consisting
of bliss and omnipotent, has to depend on nothing. Why? “On
account of desire”, i.e. on account of intention, as declared by the
scriptural text:—‘He desired: “May I be many”’ (Tait. 2.6).⁴
1 Ś.B 1.1.17, pp. 221-22.
2 Cf. also Chānd. 6.2.3. ‘Sa aīkṣata bahu syām’, etc.
3 ŚK. B. 1.1 19, pp. 237 ff, Part 1. 4 Ś, R, Bh, B.