वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

60 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [SŪ. 1. 1. 17.
ADH. 6.]
the object to be explained and the explanation, refer to the same
topic. Hence that which consists of bliss is the Highest Self alone.
SŪTRA 17
"NOT THE OTHER, ON ACCOUNT OF INAPPROPRIATENESS"
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
The qualities peculiar to the Lord, which are mentioned in
Scripture as relating to that which is signified by the term 'consisting
of bliss', being "inappropriate" on the part of anything else, "the
other", i.e. the individual soul, is not signified by the term 'consisting
of bliss'
Vedānta-kaustubha
"The other", i.e the individual, soul is not to be understood
here by the term 'consisting of bliss'. Why? "On account of
inappropriateness", i.e. the creatorship of the entire world and the
like, mentioned as relating to that which consists of bliss in the
scriptural text: "He wished: 'May I be many, may I procreate'
He created all this" (Tait. 2.6), are not appropriate on the part of
the individual soul. Hence that which consists of bliss is Brahman
alone.
Or else, the following construction (of the sūtra) may be under-
stood:—The individual soul, "other than" Brahman, is not "mantra-
described", because the qualities which are peculiar to the "mantra-
described", viz. being the object to be attained by the wise and so on,
are "inappropriate" on the part of anything else.
COMPARISON
Rāmānuja
Reading same, interpretation different—'The other (viz. the
individual) (is) not (the object of the text: "Truth, knowledge and
infinite", Tait. 2.1), on account of inappropriateness'. That is,
Rāmānuja takes this sūtra as continuing more particularly the theme
of the preceding sūtra where it has been shown that Brahman is
designated by the text 'Truth, knowledge and infinite' (Tait. 2.1)
Here it is shown, he points out, that none else than the Lord, not