वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 3. 4. 20.
ADH. 1.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 733
sacrificial faggot below (the ladle). He holds it above for the gods"
(Āp. Ś.S. 9.11.8-9)—here though occurring in the same sentence
with the holding of the faggot below the ladle, the holding of the
faggot, by separating it, over the clarified butter placed in a ladle is
enjoined because of being something new (not enjoined before),¹—
so here too. It has been said in the section treating of what is com-
plimentary (action): "But (there is) an injunction with regard to the
holding, on account of being something new" (Pū. Mī. Sū. 3.4.3²).
Although with regard to this stage of life, there is an injunction cele-
brated in a text of the Jābāla, viz "Having completed the life of a
religious student, let one become a house-holder. Having become a
house-holder, let one become a dweller in the forest. Having become
a dweller in the forest, let one wander forth. Or else, let one wander
forth from the very life of a religious student, or from the house, or
from the forest. The day one gets indifferent to the world, let him
wander forth on that very day" (Jābāla 4),—yet it is shown by his
Holiness that the other stage of life occurs in other texts as well
irrespective of that,—this is to be understood here. The texts, viz.
"He who extinguishes the fire is the slayer of the hero of the gods"
(Tait. Sam. 1.5.2). "After having brought an acceptable gift for the
teacher, let him not cut off the line of progeny" (Tait. I. 11), "One who
is childless does not possess the world" (Ait. Br. 33.1) and so on, are
concerned with people hankering after enjoyment. Hence it is
established that the end of men arises from knowledge.
Here ends the section entitled "The end of Men" (1).
COMPARISON
Baladeva
He continues here the same topic, viz. whether a knower of Brah-
man must work or not. Hence the sūtra: "Or (the text designating
¹ I.e. the above passage may be conceived as a coherent and unbroken
whole if we take it to be referring to one thing only, viz the holding of the faggot
below. Nevertheless, we conceive it as enjoining the holding of the faggot above
too, since this latter is not enjoined anywhere else.
² The sūtra really reads: "Vidhīstu apūrvatvāt syāt".