वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

54 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [SŪ. 1. 1. 13.
ADH. 6.]
COMPARISON
Rāmānuja
Reading and interpretation same. Rāmānuja points out in
conclusion that this adhikaraṇa is also a refutation of the theory of
the Nirguṇa Brahman, since it asserts 'perceiving' or 'willing' on
the part of the creator of the world, and 'willing' means being
possessed of the quality of intelligence ¹
Baladeva
This is sūtra 11 in his commentary. Reading same, interpretation
different, viz 'And because (the Nirguṇa Brahman) is mentioned in
Scripture'. That is, Scripture proves the Nirguṇa Brahman to be
the creator, and not the Saguṇa Brahman.²
The difference is that while according to Nimbārka (and others
too), this section is concerned with the question as to whether Brahman
or pradhāna is the creator of the world, according to Baladeva, the
question is as to whether the Nirguṇa Brahman or the Saguṇa Brahman
is the creator of the world.
Adhikaraṇa 6: The section entitled 'That which
consists of bliss'. (Sūtras 13–20)
SŪTRA 13
"(BRAHMAN IS) THAT WHICH CONSISTS OF BLISS, ON ACCOUNT OF
REPETITION."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
"That which consists of bliss" is the Supreme Soul alone, but not
the individual soul. Why? On account of the repetition (in Scrip-
ture) of the word 'bliss' with reference to the Highest Self.
Vedānta-kaustubha
Thus, by way of refuting the doctrine of pradhāna, it has been
shown that scriptural texts like "'The existent alone, my dear!'"
¹ Śrī. B. 1.1.12, p. 166, vol. 1.
² G. B. 1.1.11, pp. 54-55, Chap. I