वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 3. 3. 59.
ADH. 26.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 705
COMPARISON
Baladeva
This is sūtra 61 in his commentary. He takes it as forming an
adhikaraṇa by itself. Interpretation like Nimbārka's.
Adhikarana 26: The section entitled "Of the
same nature as the bases".¹ (Sūtras 59–64)
PRIMA FACIE VIEW (Sūtras 59–62)
SŪTRA 59
"(THE MEDITATIONS BASED) ON THE SUBSIDIARY PARTS (OF
SACRIFICES) ARE OF THE SAME NATURE AS THEIR BASES."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
(The author) raises an objection, viz. On account of numerous
indicatory marks, there is a regular inclusion in sacrifices of the
meditations based on their subsidiary parts like the udgītha and the,
rest.
The meditations based on the udgītha and the rest are of the
nature of subsidiary parts like the udgītha.
Vedānta-kaustubha
It has been pointed out that the meditations aiming at objects
of desire are to be practised at will. Now, although it has been
pointed out under the aphorism: "Non-restriction with regard to
the specification of that" (Br. Sū. 3.3.41) that those meditations also
which are based on the subsidiary parts of sacrifices may be included
in those sacrifices at will,—yet with a view to confirming it strongly,
(the author) raises an objection, viz. that as these (meditations on the
subsidiary parts of sacrifices) subserve those sacrifices, as the subsidiary
parts themselves do, they are to be included in sacrifices regularly.
On the doubt, viz. whether the meditations which are based on
the subsidiary parts of sacrificial acts, such as the udgītha and the
¹ Vide Br. Sū. 3.3.41, where the topic has already been treated.