वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ 3. 3. 42.
ADH. 19.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 673
COMPARISON
Baladeva
This is sūtra 43 in his commentary. He too takes it to be an
adhikaraṇa by itself, concerned, however, with an entirely different
topic The question is as to whether the Lord is to be meditated on
as Kṛṣṇa alone. The answer is : "(There is) no restriction with regard
to the specifying of that (viz. the Lord), (i.e. there is no fixed rule that
the Lord is to be worshipped as Kṛṣṇa alone), on account of that
being found (in Scripture), for there is a soparate fruit, (viz.) non-
obstruction (of the worship of Kṛṣṇa)". That is, the worship of
Kṛṣṇa is the unobstructed or direct means to salvation, while the
worship of other deities is the indirect means ¹
Adhikaraṇa 19. The section entitled "Offer-
ing". (Sūtra 42)
SŪTRA 42
“SIMPLY AS IN THE CASE OF OFFERING, THAT HAS BEEN SAID.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
During the meditations on the attributes also, the meditation
on the dahara (or the small), the substratum of the attributes, is to be
repeated as qualified by those attributes respectively, "as in the case
of the offering" of the sacrificial cake ², designated in the text:
"Let one offer the sacrificial cake on eleven potsherds to Indra, the
king, to Indra, the over-lord, to Indra, the self-ruler" (Tait. Saṃ.
2.3.6 ³). "That has been said," viz. "Diverse, forsooth, are the
divinities, owing to different conceptions".⁴
Vedānta-kaustubha
It has been said above that the meditations founded on the sub-
sidiary parts of sacrificial acts are not to be inserted in those acts
¹ G.B. 3.3.43, pp. 189-190, Chap. 3.
² Puroḍāś.
³ Ś, R, Bh, Śk. P. 174, lines 13-14, vol. 1.
⁴ Ś, R, Bh, Śk.