वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)
Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary
भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 652, कुल 906 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें[sū 3. 3. 28.
ADH. 12.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 631
to get rid of them ever, seeing that it will not be possible for him, a
disembodied soul, to acquire any further knowledge. Further, if
knowledge be the cause of the destruction of works, as soon as
the knower attains knowledge, all his works must decay at once.
Scripture also declares so. Hence our view is preferable, since it
avoids a two-fold contradiction—viz. makes knowledge the direct
cause of the destruction of works and does not contradict Scripture.¹
Rāmānuja
Interpretation different. He here explains the Kauṣītaki-text
(Kaus. 1.4) which seems to go against the view that the soul leaves
all its works at the time of leaving the body. Hence the sūtra: "(The
different parts of the text are to be arranged) at will, on account of the
non-contradiction of both (viz. reason and Scripture)". That is,
as it has been established on the ground of reason as well as Scripture
that the soul leaves all its works at the time of its departure from the
body, in order that these two—reason and Scripture—be not contra-
dicted, the parts of the Kauṣītaki-text are to be re-arranged to suit
the above conclusion, i.e. the part: 'He then discards good and evil
deeds' is to be put before the part: 'Having attained the path of gods,
he comes to the world of fire'.²
Śrīkaṇṭha
Literal interpretation same, but the fundamental difference is
that he takes it to be laying down the prima facie view.
Baladeva
This is sūtra 29 in his commentary. He begins a new adhikaraṇa
here (two sūtras), concerned with showing the two ways of meditating
on the Lord. Hence the sūtra: "(Either of the two modes of medi-
tation, viz. on God, the sweet or on God, the Majestic, leads to salva-
tion) through the will (of the Lord), since there is no conflict between
the two, (i.e. there are texts to both effects and the devotee may
choose either of them)".³ The word "no" is to be supplied from sūtra
3.3.22.
¹ Ś.B. 3.3.28, p. 806. ² Śrī. B. 3.3.28, p. 298, Part 2.
³ G.B. 3.3.29, pp. 158-159, Chap. 3.